Live data from Hacker News

We are sorry to inform you

fang.ece.ufl.edu

51–56 of 56 posts

Re: We are sorry to inform you

#51
post #50
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd say he will be the most influential economist of both centuries. For those who don't who he is, the man is a fantastic public speaker on top of everything and there are a ton of videos on YouTube to get you familiarized.

Sadly, you mean "was".

No, I mean will. The 21st century isn't over yet.

Re: We are sorry to inform you

#53
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd say he will be the most influential economist of both centuries. For those who don't who he is, the man is a fantastic public speaker on top of everything and there are a ton of videos on YouTube to get you familiarized.

I highly recommend the video series "Free to Choose", regardless of your politics or background in economics there is something to be learned from it.

http://www.freetochoose.tv/

Re: We are sorry to inform you

#55
post #4

I'm pretty sure this isn't actual rejection notices for these papers, but made up ones in jest.

It would be VERY interesting to know if that's the case. The meme of what seems to be a brilliant idea being pooh-pooh'ed by the then-current intelligentsia is almost as common as funny cat pictures with silly quotes. "In 1962, Smith entered Yale University. While attending Yale, he wrote a paper for an economics class, outlining overnight delivery service in a computer information age. Folklore suggests that he rece…

I'm pretty sure that nobody would have rejected the RSA paper with a note that argued that there was some 32-bit limit. If I've got my history correct, the Diffie-Hellman _New Directions in Cryptography_ paper had already been published, and it already used the same basic mathematical operation (exponentiation modulo a large number). Everyone knew that, sooner or later, a full public-key encryption algorithm would be found.
Post reply on HN