Nicely demonstrates why outsourcing link shorteners is risky - they go out of business and your link is dead.
A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy
51–60 of 104 posts
Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy
#52Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy
#53Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy
#54Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy
#55I would consider this innovative, but Office365 has had this built in (and as far as I can tell impossible to turn off) for years. What used to be a sensible link turns into a vast "safe link honest, guv" mess. I call it "man in the middle attack as a service"
Teams just generates mile long URLs that encode more information than some of the meetings themselves in the worst case.
Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy
#56I would consider this innovative, but Office365 has had this built in (and as far as I can tell impossible to turn off) for years. What used to be a sensible link turns into a vast "safe link honest, guv" mess. I call it "man in the middle attack as a service"
Same with PayPal. I've received perfectly valid emails direct from PayPal that include random sketchy links from third parties that are obvious phishing expeditions. I reported it to PayPal, but the ability still exists.
The only reason why companies don't care about it in the context of mail is because there is no equivalent to safe browsing for mails, so Domains aren't penalized by Google for sending fraudulent messages at small scale. If this was to change, they'd all pivot to using secondary domains for these mails, like GitHub does for GitHub pages.
It would also be a pretty pointless feature as you'd probably complain anyway, as the email would still come from a Paypal owned domain.
On the same topic: if you've got a Gmail address you're also able to send from @googlemail.com
Is this another security issue in your opinion?
Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy
#57I would consider this innovative, but Office365 has had this built in (and as far as I can tell impossible to turn off) for years. What used to be a sensible link turns into a vast "safe link honest, guv" mess. I call it "man in the middle attack as a service"
Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy
#58I would consider this innovative, but Office365 has had this built in (and as far as I can tell impossible to turn off) for years. What used to be a sensible link turns into a vast "safe link honest, guv" mess. I call it "man in the middle attack as a service"
Same for MS Teams. Before, we used Google Meet, which produced 9-letter meeting IDs, that I would be able to remeber if I really wanted to. Teams just generates mile long URLs that encode more information than some of the meetings themselves in the worst case.
Sadly this is also possible with a 9-letter code.
Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Forgive my old-fashioned-ness, but... Why is metered cloud hosting a better choice here than a $5/mo. VPS?
> $5/mo. VPS I think you may even get 256 megs of ram for that these days.
Here though, that service could be hosted on a static website (free at github/gitlab/cloudfare/etc), with client-side javascript used to decode data encoded in the url fragment.
Re: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy
#60I would consider this innovative, but Office365 has had this built in (and as far as I can tell impossible to turn off) for years. What used to be a sensible link turns into a vast "safe link honest, guv" mess. I call it "man in the middle attack as a service"
[deleted]