51–60 of 177 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not how the UK works. We invented the nanny state.
And the nanny fetish, although that seems to be rather particular to a certain class of people in the UK. That said, full credit on the nanny dog, Staffordshire bull terriers are amazing with children.
The same privacy preserving features of Tutanota enjoyed by privacy conscious individuals, make it ideal for fraudsters. We experience a large number of fraudulent ecommerce orders using Tutanota email domains. I'm not shocked to think that this could be an example of an algorithm gone awry based on the signals it received.
I’m sure there are the same or more number of fraudulent cases coming from gmail accounts but they don’t block that one
Three also have a transparent HTTP proxy, which breaks apt updates, so you have to manually replace http with https in your apt sources.list.
How are they breaking apt? Aren’t signatures checked only on the package itself?
Once again I will say that ThreeUK is the worst UK network. I switched to EE and it’s been a breeze. Giffgaff was also good when I used it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Out of curiosity, do the UK content blocks apply to people roaming with a foreign sim? I'm also on three ie, just haven't been to the UK in ages.
Generally no. Roaming data sessions are tunnelled back to the host provider.
Slightly off topic, but I was with Three UK for a while. Reception was universally terrible, and trying to use mobile data was a joke. This was in a small urban centre... called London. Would never, ever touch them again. Back on topic, it seems that they are not using Bluecoat/Symantec Site review (which I suspect other providers do), which has the domain categorised correctly: https://sitereview.bluecoat.com/#/look…
Interestingly, ThreeIE doesn't block them. And I'm fairly happy with them (>1Gbit/s on 5G still blows my mind), except for when I'm travelling to London and have to roam on 3 UK (I agree it sucks)