Live data from Hacker News

Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA

wwws.whitehouse.gov

51–60 of 84 posts

Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA

#51
post #49
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you read the petition? It seems like you're missing the joke in this one...

What joke? Four, well reasoned and exceptionally well written petitions have gone up to this very website and the administration responded with insultingly dismissive answers that did not, end the end, address anything.

[deleted]

Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA

#52
I received another letter from the white house. I am going to say it now. whitehouse.gov is BS. It is complete and utter bs. You are lucky if an intern looks at it, probably just a pre-canned response to any media whatever. All these petitions say is "bla bla bla write me some bs"

We need a better methodology.

Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA

#53
post #50
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you're saying that some online petitions are actually meant to diffuse dissent about the thing they're petitioning? That would be a stroke of evil genius if it's true. Doesn't strike me as being the case so much as their being driven by naive idealism, but in the case of the whitehouse one, it's at least conceivable. In the long run, it's probably just going to demonstrate to a lot of people that online petitions…

Online petitions exist to harvest email addresses so they can hit you up for donations and volunteering during the campaign. They're an easy way for campaign staff to build a mailing list of people politically engaged enough to be worth spamming.

This is definitely one of the reasons for online petitions. I doubt that's why Whitehouse.gov exists.

Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA

#54
I disagree, although I'll sign it. A petition should be created to not only stop SOPA but demand INTERNET FREEDOM laws. This will make it impossible to present any SOPA without repealing the law as there's a direct conflict.

Otherwise there'll be another attempt at SOPA after outrage fatigue. And there had been many before.

Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA

#55
post #33
post #22

8k votes... that is just sad...

In a couple hours. On a Sunday.

on a law that is one step shy of banning the whole internet world-wide. since pretty much every site allows some user content and a single accusation will down that entire site, i'd hope for a better response than that.

edit: banning is too harsh. censored to the agreement of all corporate interests, all potential corporate interests and the interests of those rich and American enough to have influence

Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA

#56
post #7

I created an account in order to sign this, but when I try to sign in I get a 404 -- using Chrome. Anyone else get that?

I got it as well, in FF. Most of the time, these things get a one-strike-and-adios policy for me, but on this it seems important enough to try again later...

I just tried in Chrome and Firefox. Finally tried IE. Guess what? It worked. Sigh.

Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA

#57
post #49
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you read the petition? It seems like you're missing the joke in this one...

What joke? Four, well reasoned and exceptionally well written petitions have gone up to this very website and the administration responded with insultingly dismissive answers that did not, end the end, address anything.

The "joke" is that the petition links to copyright-infringement hosted on imgur.

Under SOPA, whitehouse.gov would be taken down because someone posted this petition :)

Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA

#58

I'm in Canada, and I've realized that SOPA would damage me too, since the domain would be removed from the DNS. People here are suggesting calling their representatives, but which one should I call? Would they even bother listening to someone, who ate the end of the day, is not going affect their chance of reelection? I'd still like to be able to do something since SOPA and Protect IP are quite horrible laws.

FWIW, when you call a Senator or Congressperson, they ask for your name and zip. Nothing else. You can theoretically grab any zipcode in their district off of Google and use it. Just saying.

Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA

#60
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(Assuming Polis is one of the sponsors of SOPA) Call them anyways. Mention that you're from their district.

Polis is actually "one of us" -- he made a good amount of money doing startups. He opposes SOPA. In this case, call him up and send him some love for doing the right thing. He's a pretty awesome guy -- check him out here entering the lyrics to "The Internet is for Porn" from Avenue Q into the congressional record: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owyNvlVJ1qE

While that's quite funny, it bothers me that he seems to be arguing for SOPA to effectively not cover porn. Why is it that the intellectual property rights of pornographers should not be protected? Why are their rights not as important as the rights of others?
Post reply on HN