Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you read the petition? It seems like you're missing the joke in this one...
What joke? Four, well reasoned and exceptionally well written petitions have gone up to this very website and the administration responded with insultingly dismissive answers that did not, end the end, address anything.
Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA
51–60 of 84 posts
Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA
#52We need a better methodology.
Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you're saying that some online petitions are actually meant to diffuse dissent about the thing they're petitioning? That would be a stroke of evil genius if it's true. Doesn't strike me as being the case so much as their being driven by naive idealism, but in the case of the whitehouse one, it's at least conceivable. In the long run, it's probably just going to demonstrate to a lot of people that online petitions…
Online petitions exist to harvest email addresses so they can hit you up for donations and volunteering during the campaign. They're an easy way for campaign staff to build a mailing list of people politically engaged enough to be worth spamming.
Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA
#54Otherwise there'll be another attempt at SOPA after outrage fatigue. And there had been many before.
Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA
#558k votes... that is just sad...
In a couple hours. On a Sunday.
edit: banning is too harsh. censored to the agreement of all corporate interests, all potential corporate interests and the interests of those rich and American enough to have influence
Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA
#56I created an account in order to sign this, but when I try to sign in I get a 404 -- using Chrome. Anyone else get that?
I got it as well, in FF. Most of the time, these things get a one-strike-and-adios policy for me, but on this it seems important enough to try again later...
Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you read the petition? It seems like you're missing the joke in this one...
What joke? Four, well reasoned and exceptionally well written petitions have gone up to this very website and the administration responded with insultingly dismissive answers that did not, end the end, address anything.
Under SOPA, whitehouse.gov would be taken down because someone posted this petition :)
Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA
#58I'm in Canada, and I've realized that SOPA would damage me too, since the domain would be removed from the DNS. People here are suggesting calling their representatives, but which one should I call? Would they even bother listening to someone, who ate the end of the day, is not going affect their chance of reelection? I'd still like to be able to do something since SOPA and Protect IP are quite horrible laws.
Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA
#59Re: Whitehouse.gov petition to veto SOPA
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
(Assuming Polis is one of the sponsors of SOPA) Call them anyways. Mention that you're from their district.
Polis is actually "one of us" -- he made a good amount of money doing startups. He opposes SOPA. In this case, call him up and send him some love for doing the right thing. He's a pretty awesome guy -- check him out here entering the lyrics to "The Internet is for Porn" from Avenue Q into the congressional record: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owyNvlVJ1qE