I’m seeing a lot of responses clarifying that this app is designed for folks who either can’t afford to code from a computer (for various reasons outside of their control) or want to quickly prototype ideas or make changes to existing projects. To better illustrate my skepticism (and bias), I’d like to invoke an imperfect analogy to writing novels.
Imagine a mobile notes app that touts an impressive list of features and ergonomics that allows anyone to write the next novel from anywhere. You no longer need a computer or even an internet connection, just the $100 phone in your pocket and the desire to put words on (digital) paper. It’ll even figure out what you’re writing about and suggest novel plot devices and character arcs to add to your work in progress.
This sounds great on the surface, and it will definitely encourage more people to feel comfortable writing more often, which will no doubt lead to more literature being written as a result, much of which will benefit from the creative AI-injected prose.
The main issue as I see it (and I realize the analogy to writing novels is imperfect), is that the environment in which you’re writing, navigating, executing, and debugging code contributes greatly to one’s productivity and the quality of the final product. I can see the argument for being more of a playground for toy projects and ideas (much like a note-taking app), but I struggle to see this taking over as the primary tool by which technology companies are built.