Live data from Hacker News

Retired U.S. generals, admirals take top jobs with Saudi crown prince

washingtonpost.com

51–60 of 167 posts

Re: Retired U.S. generals, admirals take top jobs with Saudi crown prince

#51
post #24

Apparently British officers are taking positions with the Chinese too.

Just in case you need another data point.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/hong-kong-protesters-turn...

Having lived through this, it's a bit funny to me that most people aren't aware the Chinese crackdown on Hong Kong protests was led by British officers on the field. Inconvenient truths I guess.

Re: Retired U.S. generals, admirals take top jobs with Saudi crown prince

#52
post #41

Working for the butcher prince. We don't need that kind of people near any NATO army. Let's hope they stay in Saudi Arabia. In other news, this is just another symptom of a shrinking US empire. Pax americana is starting to crumble.

Generals who oversaw Abu Ghraib are no different.

Pax Americana is definitely crumbling before our eyes.

Re: Retired U.S. generals, admirals take top jobs with Saudi crown prince

#53
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Law is only a paper veneer to keep honest people honest. Not all laws.[1] > Legal acts do about as much to deter desertion and security leaks as speed limit signs keep people from speeding. Seems to be working well so far. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_law_of_universal_gr...

But I hear that black holes are *notoriously* dishonest...

Because you can't get any accurate information out of them?

Re: Retired U.S. generals, admirals take top jobs with Saudi crown prince

#55
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But I hear that black holes are *notoriously* dishonest...

Because you can't get any accurate information out of them?

I was thinking that they don't obey Newton's laws...

Re: Retired U.S. generals, admirals take top jobs with Saudi crown prince

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's an interesting interpretation and I hope you're right. I read it and just assumed it was people finally cashing out after public service and going to the highest bidder.

Oh they do get a great payday, but that does not necessarily mean that they cut informal ties with the Pentagon or do things against the wishes of the Pentagon. In this case, the US and the Saudis have been 'tight' for 70 years so one can imagine it is all very friendly...

> does not necessarily mean that they cut informal ties with the Pentagon

Just the opposite, it's those ties and connections that the Saudi's are buying.

Re: Retired U.S. generals, admirals take top jobs with Saudi crown prince

#57
Also just today:

BBC headline "Ex-UK pilots lured to help Chinese military, MoD says"

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-63293582

With more background info: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/is-china-really-using-...

Some highlights from the BBC article:

> Former British military pilots are being lured to China with large sums of money to pass on their expertise to the Chinese military, it is claimed.

> Up to 30 former UK military pilots are thought to have gone to train members of China's People's Liberation Army.

> The retired British pilots are being used to help understand the way in which Western planes and pilots operate, information which could be vital in the event of any conflict, such as over Taiwan.

> "They are a very attractive body of people to then pass on that knowledge," a Western official said. "It's taking Western pilots of great experience to help develop Chinese military air force tactics and capabilities."

The disclaimer sentence

> There is no evidence that any pilots have broken the Official Secrets Act or that they have committed any crime.

is funny - how would they gather that evidence without confessions from the pilots involved or from the Chinese? Even if they don't tell them any secrets, there remains the fact that they train them at all. With the next big conflict where this might be used being Taiwan, where the West has already taken the opposite side.

From the second link:

> The MOD also said that the United Kingdom is only one of several Western countries whose aircrew (and likely other sources of military expertise) are currently being targeted in this way. No details were provided of other nations involved.

Personally, reading this, I think the news is getting more ridiculous by the day. I think this is much worse, I don't think Saudi Arabia is likely to end up as a direct adversary, and even if it did it would not matter much. But China...

Re: Retired U.S. generals, admirals take top jobs with Saudi crown prince

#58
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because you can't get any accurate information out of them?

I was thinking that they don't obey Newton's laws...

They obey his Law of Gravity and his Laws of Motion. Newton was not incorrect and Einstein did not invalidate Newton's laws. It's only that Newton could not explain the source of the "force" of gravity, and he was honest about this.

Re: Retired U.S. generals, admirals take top jobs with Saudi crown prince

#59
post #41

Working for the butcher prince. We don't need that kind of people near any NATO army. Let's hope they stay in Saudi Arabia. In other news, this is just another symptom of a shrinking US empire. Pax americana is starting to crumble.

Generals who oversaw Abu Ghraib are no different. Pax Americana is definitely crumbling before our eyes.

It's ok for two different things to both be bad, we don't have to pretend they're the same.

Re: Retired U.S. generals, admirals take top jobs with Saudi crown prince

#60
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would not count of SA being an ally for ever. I find this highly inappropriate especially for someone with sich high rank. Very very dangerous territory that could end up with a treason charge.

Non-competes should include compensation commensurate for the non-compete period. In the case of these individuals is the retirement package not sufficient to guard national secrets?

Your comment reminds me of a scene in the Rolling Stones' Altamont Concert film: Keith Richards is hanging out of his dressing room door and he answers a queston, "Yeah, we sold out, but it was for the money so that's okay! (laughter)" From Keith Richards, it was funny. A retired general claiming the military did not provide enough incentive to guard national secrets would also be laughable, but in a different sense.

Unrelated to the topic of this discussion and elsewhere in the film, Mick Jagger answers another question, "Am I satisfied? Sexually, yes. Philosophically, no." (Working from hazy memories here -- I last saw the movie in the 1970s, I think.)

Post reply on HN