what is this? how is it working?
Same as you, how does it work?
http://pn./
51–60 of 70 posts
Re: http://pn./
#52Works in Netscape Edit: https://ibb.co/1Th7mTX Edit: And IE: https://ibb.co/HK9pzbm Edit: Camino, one of my favorite browsers: https://ibb.co/8x3STrj (I work on retro websites and test in these all day long.)
I don't know if I'm more surprised by this quirk of DNS (as in, domains of the form ) working, or more impressed that someone's still got a readily-available Netscape install to test it out.
Re: http://pn./
#53I am impressed with HN gracefully degrading the handling of the URL. It doesn't know how to parse the url for the preview on the homepage, but it doesn't crash the page or prevent the link entry from rendering.
Re: http://pn./
#54Does not work on my Arch Linux Firefox 104.0.1 We can’t connect to the server at pn.. Did you mean to go to www.pn.?
There's some quirks that will resolve it, once its cached, but generally speaking, you need to tell systemd to resolve these names.
[0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/systemd-resolved#systemd-re...
Re: http://pn./
#55Re: http://pn./
#56No, it doesn't. (macOS Firefox)
Re: http://pn./
#57Re: http://pn./
#58I am impressed with HN gracefully degrading the handling of the URL. It doesn't know how to parse the url for the preview on the homepage, but it doesn't crash the page or prevent the link entry from rendering.
I’m not using anything fancy when I visit HN, what is it doing to preview the homepage and why would it crash or prevent anything from rendering? I don’t even understand what you’re congratulating HN for other than having hyperlinks.
Depends how strict they are at runtime
Re: http://pn./
#59Re: http://pn./
#60More information in this other post that's currently on the front page https://jameswillia.ms/posts/shortest-urls.html
Edit: nice article! I looked at the HN data and code, and trying to handle these as normal URLs with sitenames in parens would also let a lot of garbage through and/or be a lot of work. Given that the current submission kind of gracefully degraded (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32805527), I think it's probably best not to invest the effort.