Live data from Hacker News

iPhone 14: Cheapest Country to Buy in 37 Countries

nukeni.com

51–53 of 53 posts

Re: iPhone 14: Cheapest Country to Buy in 37 Countries

#51
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple's warranty in the EU is not any longer. The 2-year "warranty" required by law is not the same and only covers defects existing from the time of purchase, and after 6 months the burden of proof falls to the customer. In practice I've never seen this play out because almost all manufacturers (with Apple being an exception) offer 2-3 years of full warranty here either way.

Not true, there is second year of warranty that needs to be given to customer by store where device was purchased. Only difference is you will ask you for receipt. (I work in Apple authorised repair store)

As I said, the 2-year period mandated by law is not a standard warranty, isn't as comprehensive and usually has a different name because of that. Most companies know that it's not worth it to debate people about it and just offer 2-3 years. Apple doesn't at least officially, it's also not a big secret that they've denied responsibility for faults in their products in the past.

Though on average Apple most likely isn't the worst company to deal with.

Re: iPhone 14: Cheapest Country to Buy in 37 Countries

#52
post #14
post #5

The US price is pre-tax while others look post-tax. Also at least in the EU there is a longer warranty.

Yes it's two year warranty[0]. Although keep in mind that AFAIK this applies to consumers and if you buy with your business it might not apply -- learned this the hard way when my charger broke after 18 months. [0] https://europa.eu/youreurope/business/dealing-with-customers...

> if you buy with your business it might not apply

That is why I buy them private and then declare the invoice at the company.

Re: iPhone 14: Cheapest Country to Buy in 37 Countries

#53
post #34

In the laptop market, Apple seems to be a better value purchase, but for some reason the smartphone market seems to be a huge premium for not much value compared to the competition. I understand that in western countries there are network effects like iMessage, etc. A good Samsung or stock android-ish phone almost always seems like a more versatile/capable device. There was a time when I heard that there were great i…

> Apple .. for some reason the smartphone market seems to be a huge premium for not much value compared to the competition.

I used my iPhone 6 for 6 years and Apple once replaced the battery for a nominal fee. It got security updates all that time. I feel that was good value for money no Android could ever match unless you install FOSS on it.

Post reply on HN