What is Microsoft's contingency plan for this? Or, in fact, the FAANG's and other west-coast tech companies? The effects of a Cascadia earthquake on the US and world economy would be "interesting".
I suppose it depends on data centre locations. Data centre on the west coast? I'd be wary, mostly central and east coast? Less of a worry.
An earthquake could destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest (2015)
51–60 of 95 posts
Re: An earthquake could destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest (2015)
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
All the clouds will go down at the same time. The control planes for all them are heavily managed in Seattle.
AWS has lots of engineers in Seattle, but control plane is distributed. I'd personally expect a long delay in getting any fixes to things, but that many sites would be just fine.
Re: An earthquake could destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest (2015)
#53Re: An earthquake could destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest (2015)
#54I don't know how scientifically reliable this article is, but it gives me an idea. Could tsunami avoidance be an ideal use case for a jet pack? It doesn't need a lot of altitude or more than a few minutes of flight time, just easy rapid deployment without an airstrip. Some startup should be all over this. A combined package with an alarm triggered by an ultrasonic sensor would make a great sales pitch to well heeled…
2.) someone have a child-version (but what about infants?). Not sure about you but putting my nephews into a jet pack seems like a poor idea, they're fidgety in car seats.
3.) It's a jet pack, and you're flying. How is that possibly safe without regular maintenance and training for what would be a once in 1000 year event?
Re: An earthquake could destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest (2015)
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe they are referring to the tsunami that follows the earthquake, based on evidence from before the Europeans colonized the continent.
At least in Oregon, I-5 is 50 miles away from the coast and separated from it by a small mountain range. I don't think we're too worried about tsunamis getting all the way to I-5. Definitely will get to Highway 101 in some spots, however. But a lot of the coastline is tall enough that you can usually find a safe place nearby if a tsunami warning sounds.
I recall driving US-101 in Oregon some years back and kept seeing "Tsunami evacuation route" signs.
https://www.oregon.gov/oem/Documents/Tsunami_Evacuation_Sign...
Re: An earthquake could destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest (2015)
#56I think the year of publication of this article — 2015 — should be in the title, no?
Re: An earthquake could destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest (2015)
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
All the clouds will go down at the same time. The control planes for all them are heavily managed in Seattle.
AWS has lots of engineers in Seattle, but control plane is distributed. I'd personally expect a long delay in getting any fixes to things, but that many sites would be just fine.
Re: An earthquake could destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest (2015)
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe they are referring to the tsunami that follows the earthquake, based on evidence from before the Europeans colonized the continent.
separately, there’s risk from lahars from mt. Baker and mt. Rainier. Catastrophic Baker lahars could potentially bury even Renton based on some estimates.
Eruption-related lahars and sedimentation response downstream of Mount Hood: Field guide to volcaniclastic deposits along the Sandy River, Oregon -- https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/vsc/file_mngr/file-59/Pierson%20e...
> The Sandy River was originally named the Quicksand River by Lewis and Clark in 1805 (Moulton and Dunlay, 1990). Expedition members noted that the river (a) was ~275 m wide at its mouth and for several kilometers upstream on the delta (30-150 m wide there today); (b) had a number of mid Channel Islands; and (c) had flow which was turbid and very shallow (resembling the Platte River in Nebraska, they noted). It was given its name because "the bed of this stream is formed entirely of quick sand."
https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/old.2000/fs060-00/fs060-00.pdf
> What happened? The answer lay 50 miles away at Mount Hood. An eruption in the 1790's caused a tremendous amount of volcanic rock and sand to enter the Sandy River drainage. That sediment was still being flushed downstream when Lewis and Clark saw and named the river. Since 1806, the river has removed the excess sediment from its channel.
Re: An earthquake could destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest (2015)
#59Re: An earthquake could destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest (2015)
#60Don't get too comfortable if you're on the East Coast. Whatever survives sea level rise due to global heating, will be wiped out by the megatsunami caused by the ensuing landslide when La Palma erupts.
Consider that the displaced water from this point event would radiate out in 360 degrees from the Canaries, dissipating with the square of distance traveled.