Live data from Hacker News

Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time

blog.joewoods.dev

51–60 of 126 posts

Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time

#51
post #47
post #36

Can we overlay this with the nasdaq or some other stock index/other economic indicators?

Ask and you shall receive https://i.imgur.com/fN5EoIB.png

If you started that chart in 2020 it would be pretty eerie. If I worked at motley fool I’d regurgitate this as a blog post, Reddit dd thread, and so much more.

But really if I knew finance I’d be interested to see - since who’s hiring is posted the first day of the month, using month over month/etc post volume to inform trades.

Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time

#52

In economics data, they tend to do seasonal adjustments. I would be curious to see if there’s seasonality here.

Good thought, though fiscal year v calendar year probably messes that up. Oracle did budgeting in FYQ1 and so tended to not hire much during that quarter, but then hired a lot in Q2, then slightly less Q3/4.

Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time

#53
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you assuming each request takes a second, or how long? A blog should return fast enough that this isn't the case Edit: Yes, even WordPress. Unless there are 50 plugins, an unoptimized theme, zero caching, and a resource constrained server.

It does not matter how fast the backend is. A persistent HTTP connection will last 60 seconds following the latest client request, unless the browser goes out of its way to explicitly close the connection. P.S. OP's website uses Apache but the same issue of overly conservative limits still apply.

There's no way the connection just sits idle and the worker can't serve other requests for the full timeout, right? That just sounds... Wrong. And is not consistent with load testing I've done before with a nginx setup

Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time

#54
post #2

Thanks for hugging my site to death! It's hosted on a $5 DO droplet and I'm honored to have this problem. https://archive.ph/AVbPV

So the "pullback" seems similar to the one that was seen in pre-pandemic 2019.

That about correlates to my impression that this is not the recession.

Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time

#55
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Check out this thread for recommendations on static site generator plugins on top of Wordpress. Best of both worlds for folks who want high-level publishing. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31396961

you don't even need those a cache with long-enough TTL will do the magic for you https://mish.co/posts/always-cache-your-website/

A (local) cache is mostly useful for repeat visitors, not for thousands of unique visitors unless you use a CDN.

Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time

#56
post #50
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It does not matter how fast the backend is. A persistent HTTP connection will last 60 seconds following the latest client request, unless the browser goes out of its way to explicitly close the connection. P.S. OP's website uses Apache but the same issue of overly conservative limits still apply.

I can’t imagine a case where the browser wouldn’t do the decency of closing a connection.

I would expect they keep it open for an improved user experience. Much like the prefetching that browsers seem to do by default.

Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time

#58
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It does not matter how fast the backend is. A persistent HTTP connection will last 60 seconds following the latest client request, unless the browser goes out of its way to explicitly close the connection. P.S. OP's website uses Apache but the same issue of overly conservative limits still apply.

There's no way the connection just sits idle and the worker can't serve other requests for the full timeout, right? That just sounds... Wrong. And is not consistent with load testing I've done before with a nginx setup

Apache will spawn a process (at least with pfork) and the process will wait for a keep alive connection to send a new req.

Everything old is new again. Gotta tune it out.

Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time

#59
post #51
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ask and you shall receive https://i.imgur.com/fN5EoIB.png

If you started that chart in 2020 it would be pretty eerie. If I worked at motley fool I’d regurgitate this as a blog post, Reddit dd thread, and so much more. But really if I knew finance I’d be interested to see - since who’s hiring is posted the first day of the month, using month over month/etc post volume to inform trades.

I suspect the hiring stats would be a lagging indicator, not a leading indicator.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/laggingindicator.asp

Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time

#60

I started and abandoned a little side project a while ago where I wanted to see which employers tended to have the exact same (or fuzzy-the-same) "Who's Hiring" post month after month. Goal would be to find some signal about which posts were actually resulting in hiring (in other words, the company didn't come back with the same posting) and which ones were just trawling for the same job month after month without act…

In my experience, long-standing unexplained openings in small companies, including early stage startups, are signal that something is wrong.

I did see this in one example in the “who’s hiring” thread here, but also in following the newsletter for a startup I applied to.

Two reasons I saw in my last job hunt:

1. The company is lowballing wages.

2. The hiring manager for the position does not want to hire or is not aligned with the startup team‘s decision that they should hire for the role.

You can get good at qualifying for these scenarios early, but if you don’t have experience looking for and actively screening these out, a list of repeat posts might save some people time.

At least it might add weight to a possible dismissal.

Post reply on HN