Live data from Hacker News

Short URLs: Why and How

sive.rs

51–60 of 172 posts

Re: Short URLs: Why and How

#51
post #39
post #23

How many people type the whole URL and how many access it over Google, QR code, or from other site? This is good if content is unique. I find URLs with dates useful when I want to quickly assess how fresh is the content.

I often find articles that don't have the date at all, and the information turns out to be really out of date. Is hiding the date some kind of SEO trend?

Rumor has it that Google penalizes content with a date older than a year.

Re: Short URLs: Why and How

#53

I own a 3-letter domain with a 2-letter TLD and still spells my family name. Many of my friends finds it cool when I share links via that domain. The links are indeed easy to remember but it comes at a higher yearly cost of renewal and I had forgotten to renew twice. Luckily, I was able to re-register them (nobody wants it, ;-)). Example https://oin.am/rr/

Another happy owner here of a 3-letter domain with a 2-letter TLD: rio.hn. I can spell my name, Dario, as d@rio.hn. Lots of people laughs when they realize it's my name, they find it clever.

Re: Short URLs: Why and How

#54
post #31

I don't like this at all - there is value in a hierarchical naming structure - even if it doesn't represent actual directories . A simple example is: https://www.kozubik.com/ ... where you can find "items": https://www.kozubik.com/items/ ... and one thing inside of "items" is an article on NDS emitters: https://www.kozubik.com/items/nds/ ... which contains supporting multimedia objects: https://www.kozubik.com/items/…

"items" isn't very useful. Have either: example.com/ or, if categories exist: example.com/ /

A poor exemple doesn't make for a poor argument. I like hierarchical URLs because they allow me to try and find more content by stripping the end of the URL fo see what is up the hierarchy.

Re: Short URLs: Why and How

#55
post #31

I don't like this at all - there is value in a hierarchical naming structure - even if it doesn't represent actual directories . A simple example is: https://www.kozubik.com/ ... where you can find "items": https://www.kozubik.com/items/ ... and one thing inside of "items" is an article on NDS emitters: https://www.kozubik.com/items/nds/ ... which contains supporting multimedia objects: https://www.kozubik.com/items/…

"items" isn't very useful. Have either: example.com/ or, if categories exist: example.com/ /

I agree. Also, images that are meant to be included in your articles can still have long urls if you want. Unless those images are urls you want to share, of course; it's about sharing urls, and that's much easier to do when they're short.

If you've got a CMS, I suppose you could do both: store each article in its hierarchical place, but also give each article (or each article you consider important enough to share, but I would hope that's all of them) a short name through which it can easily be remembered and shared.

Re: Short URLs: Why and How

#56
I like this idea, It'll be good to have the best of both worlds. Is there a way to optimize search engine visibility for such short urls? perhaps with a good title, meta tags having keywords etc.? Is there a HTML meta tag that gives the search engine crawlers an alternate hierarchical url for the same page? I believe setting up the server to do this is not too difficult.

Re: Short URLs: Why and How

#57
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't determine the file system structure from the URLs. The can map directly, but they don't have to Also... http?

Why not http? Secure connections add overhead. It's not like this site contains any secrets?

http is still susceptible to man in the middle attacks even if the site contains no secrets. You have no guarantee that the contents of the website haven't been tampered with (not that attackers would have much incentive to tamper with a blog).

Re: Short URLs: Why and How

#59
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not http? Secure connections add overhead. It's not like this site contains any secrets?

http is still susceptible to man in the middle attacks even if the site contains no secrets. You have no guarantee that the contents of the website haven't been tampered with (not that attackers would have much incentive to tamper with a blog).

That's pretty much my point, there is no reason to meddle with the contents here. It's different if you live in a country where your ISP automatically MiTMs you (as a sibling comment to yours pointed out), but that's not a thing here at least. If you know that's a threat and it bothers you, you would likely already have measures in place anyway?

But I admit it's a valid reason to have https.

Re: Short URLs: Why and How

#60
post #4

I own a 3-letter domain with a 2-letter TLD and still spells my family name. Many of my friends finds it cool when I share links via that domain. The links are indeed easy to remember but it comes at a higher yearly cost of renewal and I had forgotten to renew twice. Luckily, I was able to re-register them (nobody wants it, ;-)). Example https://oin.am/rr/

My name is Dan Blows, and my domain is da.nblo.ws, which I thought was the coolest thing ever. Most people are confused or don’t even notice it.

Fwiw I also think it's the coolest thing ever
Post reply on HN