I built an open-source, AI-powered solar panel that's 95% optimal
51–60 of 143 posts
Re: I built an open-source, AI-powered solar panel that's 95% optimal
#52Re: I built an open-source, AI-powered solar panel that's 95% optimal
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A 400w watt panel is 250$. Wait, panels are that cheap? Could you point me to a good place to buy them?
$3 per watt, installed on your roof is typical these days: https://www.remodelingcosts.org/solar-panel-costs-increase-s... That includes labor, mounting hardware, inverters and grid tie in. It also assumes high efficiency panels. Watch out before buying older technology (lower efficiency) panels. Some have significant efficiency losses per degree Celsius increase in temperature.
Re: I built an open-source, AI-powered solar panel that's 95% optimal
#54If you know the lat/lon of the panel (they don’t move right?) and the current clock time, just point it at the current Sun position if it’s daytime? Wouldn’t that be as optimal as possible?
Re: I built an open-source, AI-powered solar panel that's 95% optimal
#55Re: I built an open-source, AI-powered solar panel that's 95% optimal
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are panels cheaper than the servo motor & Arduino used in this tool? Not to mention that at mass produced scales chip costs are usually 1/5 the price of an Arduino. What if every panel used these tools, we could increase the amount of power we gather from solar.
Our solar panels are rated to 115mph winds. What are these servo mounts rated to? Also, installation of the panels currently costs more than panels. They don't say (or I didn't find) how efficient the optimal fixed mount is, but the agent starts at 80%, so assume some fixed position is 80% of optimal. They increase that to 96%, so they reduce the number of solar panels by about 13%. If the installation labor cost inc…
That's partly the racquet people set up to snag government grant dollars, but still true.
Re: I built an open-source, AI-powered solar panel that's 95% optimal
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nowadays panels are cheap enough that if you want more power than you get with them fixed in place, you just add more panels.
Exactly. Any mechanism that moves the panel to follow the sun, must be sturdy enough to also withstand high winds, which is inevitably costlier than proof of concept ideas. Better to add more panels. A better way to ensure more power output is to have a set of panels with a small battery back to automate cooling of the panels and cleaning of the panels.
Re: I built an open-source, AI-powered solar panel that's 95% optimal
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A 400w watt panel is 250$. Wait, panels are that cheap? Could you point me to a good place to buy them?
$3 per watt, installed on your roof is typical these days: https://www.remodelingcosts.org/solar-panel-costs-increase-s... That includes labor, mounting hardware, inverters and grid tie in. It also assumes high efficiency panels. Watch out before buying older technology (lower efficiency) panels. Some have significant efficiency losses per degree Celsius increase in temperature.
Which is why I was so fascinated by someone saying that you could get panels at 250USD/400W=0.625USD/W; I suppose it's possible that all the other stuff (electrician, mounting, inverters) is the difference, but a factor of 5? That feels like an chance to do something hacky and come out way ahead (like, say, DIYing a panel to run your computers, thus cutting out rewiring the house and needing an inverter).
Re: I built an open-source, AI-powered solar panel that's 95% optimal
#59Given any GPS coordinates, couldn't one simply calculate the location of the sun in the sky to point directly toward it?
Just need your location and the time (quarter/season, month, day, hour, minute) and you'll know where the sun is in relation to the location given.
Re: I built an open-source, AI-powered solar panel that's 95% optimal
#60I'll just leave this here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wL9PcGu_xrA&t=174s