Live data from Hacker News

It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

twitter.com

51–60 of 255 posts

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#51
Since I discovered the availability of anvils on Amazon, I have always wondered about the economics of shipping them.

Right now, I can order a 66lb "Happybuy" anvil for $153 with free prime shipping. One assumes that the $153 includes the cost of shipping it all the way from China in the first place.

For comparison, a similarly sized anvil from a reputable local dealer costs $949 plus tax and shipping at the lowest rate (UPS standard) is $93.

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tungsten doesn't seem especially heavy; it's a little less than gold.

It's not the heaviest thing in the world, but it's probably the heaviest thing a person could buy a practical cube of. The main metals heavier than lead are gold, iridium, mercury, platinum, tungsten, and uranium. Uranium is a comparable price and density to tungsten, but buying iridium is gonna be at least 50x the price for something 10% denser.

Uranium at it's elemental density is a comparable price to tungsten??

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#53
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of curiosity, what kind of weights were they? I was under the impression that it has been phased out of many uses because of high toxicity (including via skin absorption when handling it)

Does lead actually absorb through the skin? I always heard the main pathway was getting lead dust on your hands and then eating/inhaling that.

Seconding this question, as unplated lead is very common for handgun-caliber bullets.

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#54

Since I discovered the availability of anvils on Amazon, I have always wondered about the economics of shipping them. Right now, I can order a 66lb "Happybuy" anvil for $153 with free prime shipping. One assumes that the $153 includes the cost of shipping it all the way from China in the first place. For comparison, a similarly sized anvil from a reputable local dealer costs $949 plus tax and shipping at the lowest r…

My friend once ordered a hot tub with 2 day shipping on Amazon Prime, and has often wondered about the economics of that purchase.

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#56
post #15
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depends how you measure it. Any X kg/lbs of matter here on earth is still that same X kg/lbs everywhere in the universe. Assuming the scale being used to weight is correctly calibrated to whatever planet it's in, it would still show up as the same amount of kg/lbs.

Depends upon what you set out to measure. lbs is specifically a unit of force. kg is specifically a unit of mass. It is a category error to equate these as measures, although (in many places) an everyday convention to do so on Earth . IIRC the English unit for mass is the slug . If the tecnical limit is 70lbs or so, that is must technically be read as lbs force -- aka force of gravity which varies with location.

> lbs is specifically a unit of force

Incorrect. The avoirdupois pound (lb) is historically a unit reflecting the long conflation of mass and force, but the modern unit of that name is expressly a mass unit that is a derived unit of the kilogram. The corresponding unit for force is the pound-force, (lbf).

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#57
An implosion-type nuclear weapon can compress matter to some multiple of the density of osmium.

This isn't useful for USPS box packaging; I just think it's neat.

edit: Also, inertial confinement fusion plasmas go up to about 1,000 g/cm³,

https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/5.0008231 ("Unified first-principles equations of state of deuterium-tritium mixtures in the global inertial confinement fusion region")

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#58

An implosion-type nuclear weapon can compress matter to some multiple of the density of osmium. This isn't useful for USPS box packaging; I just think it's neat. edit: Also, inertial confinement fusion plasmas go up to about 1,000 g/cm³, https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/5.0008231 ( "Unified first-principles equations of state of deuterium-tritium mixtures in the global inertial confinement fusion region" )

Thanks for that tip. I am about to ship an implosion-type nuclear device and my first thought was if I could use a USPS flat rate box.

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#59
post #33
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I heard that the crypto millionaires were buying Tungsten cubes for fun, I checked into the prices. Amazon lists a 1.5" cube (weighs 1 kg) at $199 and a 4" cube (that weighs 18.9 kg [0]) at $3499. There's no way I'm spending that, but I will admit to wanting to experience their density for myself. [0] free Prime shipping for the win

I wish I was a millionaire. I could fulfil my wish of owning replica of IPK that is small cylinder of Platinum-Iridium weighting very very close to kilogram.

IPK?

Re: It is physically impossible to exceed the weight limit for a Small Flat Rate Box

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not the heaviest thing in the world, but it's probably the heaviest thing a person could buy a practical cube of. The main metals heavier than lead are gold, iridium, mercury, platinum, tungsten, and uranium. Uranium is a comparable price and density to tungsten, but buying iridium is gonna be at least 50x the price for something 10% denser.

Uranium at it's elemental density is a comparable price to tungsten??

Yeah, it's part of what makes it so fantastic as armor piercing ammunition. And tank armor.
Post reply on HN