Live data from Hacker News

Impulse Space is betting on a future where launch is cheap

arstechnica.com

51–53 of 53 posts

Re: Impulse Space is betting on a future where launch is cheap

#51
post #48
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A relatively small number of nuclear missiles is enough to wipe out human civilization. There's no such thing as "a weapon more powerful than even nuclear missiles" in terms of Earth-focused weaponry. And we've done very little if anything to prevent countries from acquiring and maintaining nuclear missiles. If we let North Korea have nukes, what makes you think we would try to stop countries from developing space ca…

Also, if you have rocketry that's efficient and high-tech enough to push distant space rocks into deadly orbits, building a good ICBM arsenal is almost the same thing. Although dropping rocks at 50km/sec does save you having to build nuclear warheads, and you'd worry less about them getting shot down by missile defense. But global-scale strategic deterrents do get kind of academic past a certain point. There are plen…

In 2022 that's a decent argument.

I'm thinking a few decades in the future, when there is probably settlements on the Moon and Mars, and an asteroid mining industry that finds valuable metal asteroids and sends them to Earth orbit, maybe by attaching solar powered rockets to them.

In that world, any asteroid mining operation can destroy a lot on Earth, even by accident.

Re: Impulse Space is betting on a future where launch is cheap

#52
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Satellite internet seem to me to be a niche thing, at best. It's extremely 'cool' but in countries rich enough to buy satellite internet high speed wireless infrastructure is nearly ubiquitous. Countries without the cash to fund wireless infrastructure also don't have the cash to pay for satellite internet. On top of that some customers who might otherwise have the resources and the need live in autocratic countries…

As a current Starlink customer, I can assure you there's plenty of market outside of the "nearly ubiquitous". I live just 30 miles from a small city where the average home is served by 400Mbps cable, yet until Starlink came along I was stuck with Hughesnet, which is reminiscent of a particularly high-latency 56k dial up connection. There are a couple thousand similar households just in my county.

So... Exactly the scenario at the end of my post?

Trust me, I empathize as I am in a similar boat. But we are a small, small market comparitively. We are expensive to service, low density, and low profit. Pretty much the definition of a niche

Re: Impulse Space is betting on a future where launch is cheap

#53
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a current Starlink customer, I can assure you there's plenty of market outside of the "nearly ubiquitous". I live just 30 miles from a small city where the average home is served by 400Mbps cable, yet until Starlink came along I was stuck with Hughesnet, which is reminiscent of a particularly high-latency 56k dial up connection. There are a couple thousand similar households just in my county.

So... Exactly the scenario at the end of my post? Trust me, I empathize as I am in a similar boat. But we are a small, small market comparitively. We are expensive to service, low density, and low profit. Pretty much the definition of a niche

Yes, my point was that I think you're underestimating the size of that niche.
Post reply on HN