Fish 3.4.0
51–60 of 93 posts
Re: Fish 3.4.0
#52What about Oh My Fish https://github.com/oh-my-fish/oh-my-fish Has it been upgated to support new version?
Re: Fish 3.4.0
#53Just loving every single bit of it since I switched to it. Had a couple of thoughts of migrating to zsh mostly because its more POSIX compliant but it doesn't look like such a valid argument as time passes by
I think POSIX compliance of interactive shells is completely irrelevant. POSIX shells are relevant when you're writing scripts that will be distributed, but there's no reason that needs to be done with the same shell you use interactively. I use fish presently and zsh before that for nearly 15 years, but my shell scripts have always started with #!/bin/sh It's not like fish installs to /bin/sh, nor are /bin/sh script…
The sole reason I was contemplating switching to zsh in regards to POSIX was the fact my shell scripting knowledge is rather shallow and I could perhaps improve it a bit while working on functions I write for personal interactive use.. Needless to say I've written them in fish haha.. If my assumptions are right what I need to master is combining properly the coreutils and the general mentality of piping things from one command to another etc - I could be wrong tho
Re: Fish 3.4.0
#54Re: Fish 3.4.0
#55Exciting to see it inching toward POSIX compatibility
Re: Fish 3.4.0
#56Wanted to love/daily-drive fish but the incompatibility with bash/zsh made things more troublesome than I had the time and patience for. Exciting to see it inching toward POSIX compatibility
Re: Fish 3.4.0
#57Wanted to love/daily-drive fish but the incompatibility with bash/zsh made things more troublesome than I had the time and patience for. Exciting to see it inching toward POSIX compatibility
Re: Fish 3.4.0
#58Re: Fish 3.4.0
#59Re: Fish 3.4.0
#60People who have replaced fish with something else (other than bash and zsh) after using it for a significant time, to what and why?