Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't have that take at all. The husband knew he was being tracked, she got permission from him prior to putting any tracking devices on him. > It could have been "forgiven" (if this word even applies) had it contributed something meaningful Just because you are aware of the dangers of tracking and how these devices work it doesn't mean others are equally aware.
This is actually one of the side issues I had with the piece. The way it's written, you would think that she asked explicit permission to track him to the hospital. However, what seems to have happened in reality, is that they had previously played a harmless game of "find the Airtags". Then, some time later, possibly a large period, she uses those Airtags to track the husband. It's hard to say in either direction if…
Articles don't normally highlight the virtues of the journalist where that's not relevant to the subject of the article.