Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tell me you don't use Linux without telling me you don't use linux Wsl is pretty terrible in my experience. your better off using a vm you manage yourself. Every vendor has shared folders. Each one can use a x server to display programs in your windows window manager.
Oh please. Tell me you are a Linux zealot without telling me you are a Linux zealot. Its a tool in the toolbox. I use Linux everyday on servers at work, two desktops at home, and servers for my partners businesses. My main personal notebook is a windows device w/WSL and my main work notebook is a MacOS device, because at the end of the day, I need my computer's to just work, painlessly. WSL is great for alot of Linux…
Your right about it being a tool. A tool which has better alternatives.
A virtual machine running in virtual box or some other vendor's VM has literally none of the limitations that wsl2 does.
WSL 2 Doesn't fully support all userspace stuff, I bump into that all the time.
You can ssh into other boxes using PowerShell.
It is objectively bad compared to the alternatives.