Earlier quoted context omitted.
24 Hz is not necessarily a bad frame rate (depends for what, really), but even disregarding that most display technology is for 30/60 Hz, I don't think there is any argument that 24Hz is not worse than any higher framerate in terms of visuals. Just like 60 Hz is worse than 144 Hz or even higher rates. The difference is very noticeable. What's worse, how do you intend to display 24 Hz content on a 60 Hz monitor for ex…
NTSC is 29.97 fps and PAL is 25 fps - PAL was higher resolution because it sacrificed frame rate. (Doesn’t change your point of course) (Back in the cathode days seeing a TV set in Europe was like going to a strobe show.) As TFA says (well maybe it was in the comments) there are standard ways of conversion and you pretty much hit them but newer equipment will be able to playback 24fps natively to give the “cinema exp…
Maybe then what Halo did, was simply to compute 60 frames and throw the last 10 away...