Really interesting, will R2 support lifecycle rules like S3 does? We write around 90 million files per month to S3, if we could replace that with R2 and have the files automatically expire after 30 days that'd be a pretty amazing price reduction for us.
They appear to be focused on an automatic version: > Behind the scenes, R2 automatically and intelligently manages the tiering of data to drive both performance at peak load and low-cost for infrequently requested objects. We’ve gotten rid of complex, manual tiering policies in favor of what developers have always wanted out of object storage: limitless scale at the lowest possible cost.
Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees
51–60 of 220 posts
Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees
#52Does that mean automatic caching across regions? Low-latency read access everywhere without an extra CDN in front of it?
Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees
#53Disclaimer: I haven't used it, but planning to, since I already use their VPS.
Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees
#54For those who don't want to wait, there's DigitalOcean Spaces ( https://www.digitalocean.com/products/spaces/ ). Disclaimer: I haven't used it, but planning to, since I already use their VPS.
Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
To host static websites, you use Cloudflare Pages.
Thanks, I am familiar with Pages, but I would like to know whether R2 can also be used for this purpose, in a similar fashion as S3.
Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees
#56How will other providers respond to this now?
AWS, GC, and others do not really pay for egress charges themselves. Those super high egress charges are pretty ridiculous.
Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees
#57we are still living in 2007?
Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees
#58Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
That limitation doesn’t apply to the R2 service or Workers generally. We’ll update and clarify our ToS. Thanks for flagging!
But to clarify it _does_ apply to B2?
See: https://www.cloudflare.com/supplemental-terms/ § Cloudflare Pages and Cloudflare Workers®
The said limitation should apply however to their tranditional service with orange on whether it is B2 or not. I am not sure if being a Bandwidth Alliance partner makes a difference.
Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees
#60I know the Cloudflare team hangs out here, so thanks, and great job! This was absolutely necessary for my line of work. Couple of quick questions/confirmations: * R2 will support the same object sizes as S3? We have 500GB+ objects and could go to a 1TB per object. * R2 will support HTTP Range GETs, right? Egress bandwidth for objects on S3 is the biggest line item on the AWS bill for a company I work for, by an order…
Yes to range requests. Current object limit is smaller than that, but we don't have a fundamental restriction there. Shoot me an email to gmckeon [at] cloudflare.