This reminds me of one of the most heartbreaking projects I've ever stumbled across: http://photorequestsfromsolitary.org
I'm not sure if thanks is the right word, but thanks.
51–60 of 75 posts
This reminds me of one of the most heartbreaking projects I've ever stumbled across: http://photorequestsfromsolitary.org
I'm not sure if thanks is the right word, but thanks.
Telling each other about the evils of software patents might be satisfying, but it has zero effect. The proof is that they're still there after almost 30 years, and programmers have hated them from the start.
Here's the problem:
(1) lawyers, as we know, don't want to solve problems -- they want to make them part of their practice.
(2) your corporate managers have already spent millions on patents, and they listen to their lawyers.
(3) your professional associations (ACM & IEEE, looking at you here) are not on your side either. I don't know enough about their reasons to speculate here but you're free to.
Do a search on "abolish software patents." There are organizations devoted to doing that. Join one.
The EFF has a lengthy article [1] and note the date: 2012.
When I was at Google an engineer / lawyer (yes, there are a few of those) wrote up a one-page bill for Congress, declaring all software patents obvious. I picture you all asking a Congressional candidate at a town hall "Do you support abolishing software patents?" and watching him or her panic and stall, and direct their staff to look into it.
Finally, I got the "file wrapper" for this patent. It was amazingly quick: less than two years. The PTO rejected it and then they amended it, and that's pretty much all there was. These things are incredibly boring to read and I can't summarize the details in any quick way.
[1] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/06/want-abolish-software-...
This is your regular reminder about Preaching To The Choir. Telling each other about the evils of software patents might be satisfying, but it has zero effect. The proof is that they're still there after almost 30 years, and programmers have hated them from the start. Here's the problem: (1) lawyers, as we know, don't want to solve problems -- they want to make them part of their practice. (2) your corporate managers…
This reminds me of one of the most heartbreaking projects I've ever stumbled across: http://photorequestsfromsolitary.org
Is this a thing where inmates in solitary want to see a specific thing, and we take pics of them and send it to them? Or is this an AI training thing? Edit: This breaks my heart. I found the hand written notes from inmates. One guy just wants to see his kid he doesnt know, one guy wants an aerial shot of his old neighborhood so he can stroll mentally down his street, and another just wants a photo of, as he put it, "…
A brief taste of freedom may be more cruel than kind, though I doubt it's cruel enough to trigger the eighth amendment. On the other hand, it does meet the standard of "unusual". The Pythons pioneered the "comfy chair" torture technique, which was supposed to be a joke. But if got the brief use of a comfy chair then had to go back to a hard bench it would be worse than before.
This is evil, and everyone working on these sorts of things are irredeemable.
I can imagine Charlie Brooke frantically taking notes for the next season of Black Mirror.
It was a video of a woman basically going through the stages of raising her daughter and having her boyfriend come back into her life.
The end is basically her only having 30 minutes to decide for abortion and would have to sit through it again for another chance at abortion.
Sounds very cruel, another sign that we can't control our technological growth at all. I have a friend, a former FAANG veteran that has dedicated his life to destroying what he calls "techno-Satan", maybe he's on to something. I have also noticed that programmers have a tendency to sometimes distrust the stuff they make. I for one will never install "smart" home devices, I'm happy with my classic light switch that wo…