Live data from Hacker News

Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

latimes.com

51–60 of 285 posts

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#51

Some of the comments are assuming that all those who smoke pot are irresponsible or unable to do a job if they do smoke pot (this includes people who may only smoke at weekends/parties btw)

Some of the smartest people I have worked with smoked pot daily and before work. one is a head of engineering at netflix, another a head of IT at a big firm...

some of the highest performers I have ever worked with, and pot was a daily for them.

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#52
I'm not sure how one might reliably assess/assert impairment for a cannabis user. Traces can last for weeks and result in positive tests (blood analysis), even if the user isn't remotely stoned at the time. Don't know whether there's a breath test nowadays that indicates use in the past n hours, which might give a better idea of likely impairment.

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#53
My company fixes recruiting process and software problems. Hats off to Amazon for this. I probably have the pot smoker conversation about once a month, usually with a 50-something or older executive that is running a factory short-staffed.

Pot is radioactive for many employers because insurance discounts and employment regulations are stuck in the "Refer Madness" era (Refer Madness was a propaganda film about the dangers of pot). So, employers face two surprises: increasing liability, workers comp and other insurance AND potentially, "hi we're from a government agency and under regulation XYZ 202 sub paragraph 293888 you need to drug test and immediately fire those that flunk or we will fine you. Have a happy day!"

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#54
post #44

Well I am all in favor of legalizeing, but there is side effect: those who are smoking in public, cigarette but especially pot, must have harsh consequence. I go to some place in US and it is stinking everywhere on public streets. People can not force everybody to inhale their drug fume only because they want their high. Edit for clarifying: maybe a $200 fine is good point for starting, go up to $500 with repeating.…

Just out of curiosity and this isn’t meant to be mean, but, what kind of harsh consequence do you think would be appropriate for imposing that smell?

Not gp, but I think a fine is pretty reasonable.

Jogging in the park and inhaling pot constantly is getting really annoying. I know a number of families that moved to the burbs, and one of the reasons they voiced is the sharp increase is pot smell/smoke in the kids' playgrounds.

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Decades of exposure to intentionally misleading propaganda is difficult to ignore. It becomes a part of the worldview, making it hard to even think outside that box.

Well no, there are serious health risk associated with weed. Maybe alcohol have them too, yes both deserve legality, but this is not to say it is "safe", especially in young.

“Maybe” alcohol has health consequences? Like 95,000 deaths per year?

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pot smokers are worlds apart from 'drug addicts', which i presume you're equating with opiates or other highly physically addictive substances

yeap, so MURICA can legalize it first, secures the market, lobby "allies" into legalizing too, so it can become a global giant can't you see already the propaganda, the pro-'canabis' all around the world? a drug is a drug, my dear friend i seen many "pot" smoker in high school, they couldn't even concentrate properly during tests, they all failed miserable at society look, some even are being grabbed by amazon becaus…

A 'drug' is whatever the law dictates is a 'drug'

There's no reason why alcohol shouldn't be considered more dangerous than pot, especially considering the amount of road deaths it causes

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#57

Some of the comments are assuming that all those who smoke pot are irresponsible or unable to do a job if they do smoke pot (this includes people who may only smoke at weekends/parties btw)

A larger portion of them are from experience of hiring and being around people who smoke it. I would not employ someone who does because of those people. I have horror stories a mile long.

I know this is unpopular on internet news sites but I assure you that your social reputation isn’t that great if you smoke the stuff generally and that’s not going to change because of the propensity of people to be unreliable or dicks. The only thing that’s faulty is your perception of it.

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#59
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well no, there are serious health risk associated with weed. Maybe alcohol have them too, yes both deserve legality, but this is not to say it is "safe", especially in young.

“Maybe” alcohol has health consequences? Like 95,000 deaths per year?

Absolutely, i more made reference to how when somebody mention health impact of weed somebody else say "whatabout alcohol unhealthiness" as though it is relevant.

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#60

Well I am all in favor of legalizeing, but there is side effect: those who are smoking in public, cigarette but especially pot, must have harsh consequence. I go to some place in US and it is stinking everywhere on public streets. People can not force everybody to inhale their drug fume only because they want their high. Edit for clarifying: maybe a $200 fine is good point for starting, go up to $500 with repeating.…

I’m with you on the fines. It’s about as pleasant as snooting up someone else’s bowel contents on a train.

It is antisocial behaviour, has a health impact and needs to have a consequence.

Post reply on HN