Live data from Hacker News

What Google+ needs to do to be awesome

jonmulholland.tumblr.com

51–60 of 68 posts

Re: What Google+ needs to do to be awesome

#51
post #32

The big thing that it is missing is to let me categorize my outgoing content, and let people only pick up what they want. The mechanism that I would suggest is to have what I'd call "public circles". These are circles that I have, that I can talk to, that anyone can join/leave. That way I can easily separate out content by type (eg technical, jokes, kid stories, etc), and not worry that pushing things out is drowning…

[deleted]

Re: What Google+ needs to do to be awesome

#52
post #15

Push use of Circles across all Google products; I want the ability to share a Google Doc to all in my ‘Colleagues’ circle, share a Calendar Appointments to all in my ‘Friends’ circle or send a text message from my Android handset to all in my ‘Family’ circle. Circle integration throughout Google would be a killer feature. This is the most important one in my opinion. Google+ has so much potential if integrated proper…

I completely agree. This would be the one killer feature that would take g+ over the top. This would simply render g+ superior to all other social networks.

Re: What Google+ needs to do to be awesome

#53
post #32

The big thing that it is missing is to let me categorize my outgoing content, and let people only pick up what they want. The mechanism that I would suggest is to have what I'd call "public circles". These are circles that I have, that I can talk to, that anyone can join/leave. That way I can easily separate out content by type (eg technical, jokes, kid stories, etc), and not worry that pushing things out is drowning…

"Public Circle" concept = Facebook Page with Facebook Groups adding ability.

Re: What Google+ needs to do to be awesome

#54
post #50
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would effectively be like a Facebook Page, wouldn't it? Believe me, you won't enjoy the signal to noise ratio within these "public circles". I proprosed a different solution to the same problem, as explained here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2738084 Edit: On second read, I think we do share the same concept, just different naming.

Yup, same concept, different naming. Yet another useful variation is the idea of a public circle which multiple people can share to, aka a mailing list. There are lots of use cases for that, but that's not the primary thing that I am missing on Google+ right now.

"Public Circle" variation = Facebook Groups.

Re: What Google+ needs to do to be awesome

#55
post #54
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yup, same concept, different naming. Yet another useful variation is the idea of a public circle which multiple people can share to, aka a mailing list. There are lots of use cases for that, but that's not the primary thing that I am missing on Google+ right now.

"Public Circle" variation = Facebook Groups.

Yup. There are a lot of variations on "circles" that can make sense in different contexts. I'm hoping that Google+ adds more.

Currently I'm just categorizing people by how I know them. For instance if I know them through work, which job(s) did I work with them in?

Re: What Google+ needs to do to be awesome

#56
post #32

The big thing that it is missing is to let me categorize my outgoing content, and let people only pick up what they want. The mechanism that I would suggest is to have what I'd call "public circles". These are circles that I have, that I can talk to, that anyone can join/leave. That way I can easily separate out content by type (eg technical, jokes, kid stories, etc), and not worry that pushing things out is drowning…

This sounds like thenextweb.com's implementation of RSS subscriptions. A modal window pops up when you click the RSS icon on the right; it says "Pick & Mix The Blogs You Want to Subscribe To". Is that similar to what you propose? I do like that.

Looking forward trying all this stuff out. Hope they send more invites soon, they actually opened for about 30 minutes last midnight.

Re: What Google+ needs to do to be awesome

#57
post #55
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Public Circle" variation = Facebook Groups.

Yup. There are a lot of variations on "circles" that can make sense in different contexts. I'm hoping that Google+ adds more. Currently I'm just categorizing people by how I know them. For instance if I know them through work, which job(s) did I work with them in?

You are requesting nested circles.

Re: What Google+ needs to do to be awesome

#58
post #57
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yup. There are a lot of variations on "circles" that can make sense in different contexts. I'm hoping that Google+ adds more. Currently I'm just categorizing people by how I know them. For instance if I know them through work, which job(s) did I work with them in?

You are requesting nested circles.

I am not requesting nested circles. Though a lot of people have requested that.

Re: What Google+ needs to do to be awesome

#59
post #45
post #32

The big thing that it is missing is to let me categorize my outgoing content, and let people only pick up what they want. The mechanism that I would suggest is to have what I'd call "public circles". These are circles that I have, that I can talk to, that anyone can join/leave. That way I can easily separate out content by type (eg technical, jokes, kid stories, etc), and not worry that pushing things out is drowning…

That would effectively be like a Facebook Page, wouldn't it? Believe me, you won't enjoy the signal to noise ratio within these "public circles". I proprosed a different solution to the same problem, as explained here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2738084 Edit: On second read, I think we do share the same concept, just different naming.

I'm working on a very early stage startup to solve this exact problem. One of our main challenges though seems the hardest part of finding a solution is having a social graph to test with, or how to gain traction in the first place. Content algorithms inherently need a lot of participation.

Re: What Google+ needs to do to be awesome

#60
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm thinking they don't need a separate "events" feature, but just tight integration with Google Calendar. When I can create an event in GCal and invite by Circles, etc., then they'll have a pretty slick "events" setup.

Don't forget that a lot of the appeal of the FB's events feature is seeing who else is invited, who else is attending, the whole description and possible discussion that can also occur. Sometimes details need to be organised, comments made etc... I think it would also be cool and useful when uploading pictures to be able to tag an event so there is an album which people invited to the event can see and comment.

Sure, and I'm not arguing against any of that... I'm just saying that the way for Google to implement "events" is to thoroughly integrate G+ with GCal, so that you can do all those things. And I hope that's what they do, as I - for one - don't want yet another place that I have to pay attention to, to keep track of events.

Thankfully almost everything calendar related supports ical or some export format that Google Calendar can handle, or it'd be a real mess. :-)

Post reply on HN