Live data from Hacker News

Roku Warns YouTube TV Customers That Service Could Go Dark

deadline.com

51–60 of 86 posts

Re: Roku Warns YouTube TV Customers That Service Could Go Dark

#51
I'm a bit confused about the logic here. Roku seems to be claiming that YouTube TV has a dominant position, and Google is threatening to withhold it to get unfair benefits for the unrelated YouTube app. But the directionality is the wrong way around; YouTube TV the smaller of those services by orders of magnitude. It's dominates nothing at all, and it's a small miracle that it still exists at all. How could it possibly be used to extract unfair concessions?

Does anyone have a link to the full statement? Maybe this got garbled by the reporting somehow.

Re: Roku Warns YouTube TV Customers That Service Could Go Dark

#52
post #51

I'm a bit confused about the logic here. Roku seems to be claiming that YouTube TV has a dominant position, and Google is threatening to withhold it to get unfair benefits for the unrelated YouTube app. But the directionality is the wrong way around; YouTube TV the smaller of those services by orders of magnitude. It's dominates nothing at all, and it's a small miracle that it still exists at all. How could it possib…

What was emailed to customers: https://pastebin.com/C3cEE3qq

The article with the most amount of direct quotes I could find: https://variety.com/2021/digital/news/roku-youtube-tv-google...

Some comments from Roku's founder on a prior, similar situation: https://popculture.com/streaming/news/roku-founder-reveals-w...

Re: Roku Warns YouTube TV Customers That Service Could Go Dark

#53
post #33

I'm a bit amazed these "live TV" style services even still exist and people use them. It kind of makes sense for specifically live content -- sports, mainly -- but these are basically 1980's style cable TV delivered "over the internet". The killer feature of services like Netflix is not really the "over the internet" part, it's the "watch any show on demand" and "massive library so you can start watching from S1E1, i…

There’s still a lot of Live TV: news, sports and serials. There’s an aspect to live that, while is going through a transformation, will always exist. You might not find any utility in it, but over 100M households in the US alone still have a pay TV subscription.

Part of it is too that a lot of people just like to have the TV on with whatever sports, documentaries, cable news, etc. is on as a sort of background even if they're not really sitting down to watch it.

Re: Roku Warns YouTube TV Customers That Service Could Go Dark

#54
post #10
post #4

Does Youtube TV still have commercials for on-demand content? Back at the beginning, I signed up for a trial. The first thing I did was try some on-demand, and it made me sit through A LOT of commercials before the content started. Considering that Youtube TV was 4-5x the cost of Netflix and Amazon Prime, and both are commercial-free, I canceled immediately. I watch so little TV that it's cheaper to just buy the show…

It does, because it's essentially the same thing as old school cable TV. You're getting access to ABC, CBS, PBS, NBC, Fox, FX, CNN, TNT, EPSN, BBC America, Food Network, HGTV, and so on. There's not really any service that offers (all of) that content without commercials. You can use their cloud DVR to "record" something, and after that happens, you can fast forward through the commercials. Which is similar to what y…

"You can use their cloud DVR to "record" something, and after that happens, you can fast forward through the commercials."

Has this changed? When I tried YouTubeTV a couple of years ago, you could record things to the DVR, and sometimes not only would they not let you fast forward through the commercials, they replaced them with their own completely un-fast-forwardable commercials. Sometimes it would let you fast forward as normal though. This is what caused me to drop the subscription immediately.

Re: Roku Warns YouTube TV Customers That Service Could Go Dark

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think we have collective amnesia around just how bad "traditional cable" is/was (in no particular order): 1. Tons of ads 2. Ads with terrible content 3. Expensive 4. Piecemeal content (having to pay for multiple packages to get all the programs you're interested in, some options being nearly mutually exclusive) 5. You could either watch live at a time you didn't choose, record (hassle), or use a pretty terrible "on…

Issue 4 (piecemeal content) is a bit ridiculous if you think about it. Netflix, as an example, has enough content to last a person their entire life and adding more every month.

That's assuming a rather undiscriminating consumer, and honestly, may not even be true in all cases anyhow... Netflix has become extremely adept at building a UI that hides how thin their offerings have actually become. If a 20-year-old tried to make the Netflix April 2021 library last their entire life I suspect they'd be disappointed well before they are 30 assuming reasonably average amouts of time spent watching it.

Re: Roku Warns YouTube TV Customers That Service Could Go Dark

#56
post #54
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It does, because it's essentially the same thing as old school cable TV. You're getting access to ABC, CBS, PBS, NBC, Fox, FX, CNN, TNT, EPSN, BBC America, Food Network, HGTV, and so on. There's not really any service that offers (all of) that content without commercials. You can use their cloud DVR to "record" something, and after that happens, you can fast forward through the commercials. Which is similar to what y…

"You can use their cloud DVR to "record" something, and after that happens, you can fast forward through the commercials." Has this changed? When I tried YouTubeTV a couple of years ago, you could record things to the DVR, and sometimes not only would they not let you fast forward through the commercials, they replaced them with their own completely un-fast-forwardable commercials. Sometimes it would let you fast for…

I have not had that problem. But, you do have to specifically wait for the actual air time to come and go before you're able to play it with fast-forward capability.

Once that's done, I've never had an issue with fast-forward. The UI does differentiate between "recorded" and "on-demand" content.

What I have run into:

- Something I recorded is no longer available, I assume because some contract expired.

- Something that's immediately available as on-demand isn't scheduled to air "Live". I can still click the thing that says to record it, but it never airs and so never records. That's pretty rare, but it's happened.

Re: Roku Warns YouTube TV Customers That Service Could Go Dark

#57
post #33

I'm a bit amazed these "live TV" style services even still exist and people use them. It kind of makes sense for specifically live content -- sports, mainly -- but these are basically 1980's style cable TV delivered "over the internet". The killer feature of services like Netflix is not really the "over the internet" part, it's the "watch any show on demand" and "massive library so you can start watching from S1E1, i…

There’s still a lot of Live TV: news, sports and serials. There’s an aspect to live that, while is going through a transformation, will always exist. You might not find any utility in it, but over 100M households in the US alone still have a pay TV subscription.

It's interesting to look at the age breakdown [1], though. Less than 50% of respondents under 50 have cable. How much of the older population does, just out of inertia and being used to it?

There's a generation growing up now with a very different experience.

I distinctly remember my kid experiencing cable for the first time around age 3 or 4 (rainy day while we were staying at a cottage): "this is in the middle, start it over at the beginning", "I want to pick a different episode" and when the first commercial came on "hey! Put my show back on! I don't want to watch this".

[1] https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/03/17/cable-and-s...

Re: Roku Warns YouTube TV Customers That Service Could Go Dark

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think we have collective amnesia around just how bad "traditional cable" is/was (in no particular order): 1. Tons of ads 2. Ads with terrible content 3. Expensive 4. Piecemeal content (having to pay for multiple packages to get all the programs you're interested in, some options being nearly mutually exclusive) 5. You could either watch live at a time you didn't choose, record (hassle), or use a pretty terrible "on…

Issue 4 (piecemeal content) is a bit ridiculous if you think about it. Netflix, as an example, has enough content to last a person their entire life and adding more every month.

Content is not fungible. I want that show in particular and not something else, and Netflix often cannot deliver on that want.

Re: Roku Warns YouTube TV Customers That Service Could Go Dark

#59
post #23
post #4

Does Youtube TV still have commercials for on-demand content? Back at the beginning, I signed up for a trial. The first thing I did was try some on-demand, and it made me sit through A LOT of commercials before the content started. Considering that Youtube TV was 4-5x the cost of Netflix and Amazon Prime, and both are commercial-free, I canceled immediately. I watch so little TV that it's cheaper to just buy the show…

Youtube TV isn't direct competitor to Netflix, Amazon Prime, etc. but it's a great alternative for people who want cable TV channels. I found it was much cheaper, had more viewing flexibility, and better contract terms than any cable provider in my area. That said, there's no cable TV content that makes it worth being exposed to the aggressive obnoxiousness of commercials.

Except live local sports that are blacked out on any streaming package. For me, at least.

Re: Roku Warns YouTube TV Customers That Service Could Go Dark

#60
post #5

The streaming landscape is frustrating as an end user. I have a Roku TV and have used YouTube TV, Hulu and Sling for live TV. YouTube TV and Hulu seem to keep increasing their prices to the point where there's not much difference from traditional cable, other than it's easier to cancel. But then there are so many caveats. Bally Sports doesn't appear to be available in my local market to stream our MLB team. I also ne…

I basically watch no live TV except when possibly a disaster or other live event occurs, but for that if you live in a coverage area of https://www.locast.org/ it steams OTA transmissions of various regions.

They're being sued by broadcasters of course - with the EFF defending and a trial expected mid year this year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locast

Post reply on HN