> Over the last year it's be come more virulent and more deadly.
Evolution is a somewhat random process at its heart, but I stand by what I said as the likely outcome, because that's the path new diseases normally take. It's early days yet.
> We have no idea how well the vaccines are going to work
I think we have a petty good idea by now actually. A bigger question is how much will it be hampered by people afraid or unwilling to be vaccinated? I have never in my life seen such widespread and illogical fear of vaccines.
We may have to just accept that there will be an ongoing toll in the unvaccinated population that keeps the virus circulating in quantity and keeps the hospitals busy. Until sufficiently many develop natural antibodies through infection.
> We have a situation right now where a country(india) with 100 million people vaccinated is getting 350,000 cases a day, and it's doubling every 10 days. That's a scenario where the evolution around the protection a vaccine offers becomes a very real and distinct possibility.
Yes, that's a tail risk that's real and terrifying. I think the risk is small given such a mutation would possibly render the virus much less virulent. The vaccines tend to target the spike protein, without which it can't even infect humans. But nature finds a way. We can and will also adapt the vaccines in that case though. The money, motivation, and technical expertise are all there. But nobody knows how likely a risk that is.