51–60 of 310 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So it's a way to dodge the law? (while ruining the environment, of course)
No. What law is being dodged here? Again, no. Brute force Nakamoto consensus is bad for the environment, but lumping all crypto into that bucket is ignorant/intellectually dishonest.
I enjoyed the piece. Personally, I want no part of it, but I think it might work well for people who are not me. I've always been "on my own." My life really is a series of watersheds, where I've been the only person to believe in me, before the event, and a whole bunch of folks seemed to believe in me, after the fact. Not a particularly good setup for selling "Chris-Tokens™." Not a bad thing, in the long run. It hur…
Actually you do. You've demonstrated them in this very comment. Maybe you don't realize this, or maybe your self-deprecation is a deliberate part of your strategy. Either way, it worked on me. This comment led me to your profile, which led me to your company web sites, which impressed me. I don't need an iOS app developer at the moment, but if I did you'd be at the top of my list of people to contact.
I enjoyed the piece. Personally, I want no part of it, but I think it might work well for people who are not me. I've always been "on my own." My life really is a series of watersheds, where I've been the only person to believe in me, before the event, and a whole bunch of folks seemed to believe in me, after the fact. Not a particularly good setup for selling "Chris-Tokens™." Not a bad thing, in the long run. It hur…
> I don't have the personal skills to "sell" myself Actually you do. You've demonstrated them in this very comment. Maybe you don't realize this, or maybe your self-deprecation is a deliberate part of your strategy. Either way, it worked on me. This comment led me to your profile, which led me to your company web sites, which impressed me. I don't need an iOS app developer at the moment, but if I did you'd be at the…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree that there is a difference in the collateral involved, but the collateral mostly functions as a risk adjuster (which is why mortgage rates are on average lower than personal loan rates: if a borrower defaults, the house can be sold to recover part of the principal). At the end of the day, a mortgage is a contract that allows the borrower to purchase a home in exchange for a share of their future income, paid…
The difference isn’t the collateral, a personal loan like a credit card is unsecured. It’s how you calculate the payment. In a loan it doesn’t matter how much money I make, I owe what I owe. In the proposed equity arrangement I owe a percentage of my income. If I don’t make anything, I don’t owe anything. If I’m the next Musk, I owe billions.
That's just another way of saying 0 collateral.
> In the proposed equity arrangement I owe a percentage of my income. If I don’t make anything, I don’t owe anything
I agree the calculation is different, but I doubt there is a lender that isn't going to demand the return of their principal at the least.
Depending on the enforceability of such a contract (questionable and depends on the legal teeth they have in the respective jurisdictions) and the likelihood of default, it would significantly alter the risk profile.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s protocol-ized finance. Sure you can do it all old school, but that takes a ton of effort and makes your situation a unique snowflake. If you do it the way everyone has agreed on with tokens, all of your tokens plug into the existing infrastructure, is standardized, and makes the cost of capital go down. Why people continually can’t understand this, and keep saying “buh buh buh mysql and lawyer fees! No need for…
> Sure you can do it all old school, but that takes a ton of effort and makes your situation a unique snowflake. Many of the situations required in this article still require real-world contracts to make them work. The crypto tokens are additive on top of the contracts, but they don't replace contracts. Someone could sell you an NFT that represents 15% of their future earnings over the next 3 years, but the blockchai…
>Many of the situations required in this article still require real-world contracts to make them work. The crypto tokens are additive on top of the contracts, but they don't replace contracts.
There is no duality of 'real-world contract'/'digital contracts'. The question is if a digital document and signatures are accepted by a judicial system. In 50 years every judicial system will accept some format of digital contracts.
The potential upside of 'tokenized' and standardized/automated legal documents are: less ambiguous interpretations, automatic resolution, simpler trading, and easier cross-border contracts ( to some extent ).
All of this is possible by human hands, but legal systems are not known for their digital innovation. ( They don't even use standard 'diffs' to negotiate contracts )
I enjoyed the piece. Personally, I want no part of it, but I think it might work well for people who are not me. I've always been "on my own." My life really is a series of watersheds, where I've been the only person to believe in me, before the event, and a whole bunch of folks seemed to believe in me, after the fact. Not a particularly good setup for selling "Chris-Tokens™." Not a bad thing, in the long run. It hur…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference isn’t the collateral, a personal loan like a credit card is unsecured. It’s how you calculate the payment. In a loan it doesn’t matter how much money I make, I owe what I owe. In the proposed equity arrangement I owe a percentage of my income. If I don’t make anything, I don’t owe anything. If I’m the next Musk, I owe billions.
> a personal loan like a credit card is unsecured. That's just another way of saying 0 collateral. > In the proposed equity arrangement I owe a percentage of my income. If I don’t make anything, I don’t owe anything I agree the calculation is different, but I doubt there is a lender that isn't going to demand the return of their principal at the least. Depending on the enforceability of such a contract (questionable…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't have the personal skills to "sell" myself Actually you do. You've demonstrated them in this very comment. Maybe you don't realize this, or maybe your self-deprecation is a deliberate part of your strategy. Either way, it worked on me. This comment led me to your profile, which led me to your company web sites, which impressed me. I don't need an iOS app developer at the moment, but if I did you'd be at the…
I had the exact same sentiment. I'm a sucker for these types of reflective, self-deprecating descriptions for oneself. And good for him as well, because I don't doubt his honesty at all.
Neither do I. That the mark of a truly great con artist ;-)
I enjoyed the piece. Personally, I want no part of it, but I think it might work well for people who are not me. I've always been "on my own." My life really is a series of watersheds, where I've been the only person to believe in me, before the event, and a whole bunch of folks seemed to believe in me, after the fact. Not a particularly good setup for selling "Chris-Tokens™." Not a bad thing, in the long run. It hur…
> I don't have the personal skills to "sell" myself Actually you do. You've demonstrated them in this very comment. Maybe you don't realize this, or maybe your self-deprecation is a deliberate part of your strategy. Either way, it worked on me. This comment led me to your profile, which led me to your company web sites, which impressed me. I don't need an iOS app developer at the moment, but if I did you'd be at the…
Grifters interview and hire grifters because their org/team/company relies on the grift more than the truth to make ends meet. If you can't grift, you frankly don't have the skills for that job. It's an unfortunate side-effect of the nature of grifting that they can't tell you this upfront.
You’re reduced to a slave, with many masters instead of one.
No thank you.