Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is only one way to flag an article here. For a lot of people to click flag. And given this happening 7:00 San Jose time, I doubt any of mods would be logging into their mod account first thing in the morning to manually flag it. Still telling. Tech industry has a lot of communists.
Or a few people with multiple accounts.
China accused of forcing 570k people to pick cotton in Xinjiang
51–60 of 64 posts
Re: China accused of forcing 570k people to pick cotton in Xinjiang
#52How come a link to REUTERS article, with the exact headline is flagged?
There is only one way to flag an article here. For a lot of people to click flag. And given this happening 7:00 San Jose time, I doubt any of mods would be logging into their mod account first thing in the morning to manually flag it. Still telling. Tech industry has a lot of communists.
Re: China accused of forcing 570k people to pick cotton in Xinjiang
#53If the companies don’t stop buying cottons there, we can stop buying clothes from those companies. I always try to buy products from the companies that respect their workers and environment.
Re: China accused of forcing 570k people to pick cotton in Xinjiang
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is only one way to flag an article here. For a lot of people to click flag. And given this happening 7:00 San Jose time, I doubt any of mods would be logging into their mod account first thing in the morning to manually flag it. Still telling. Tech industry has a lot of communists.
But why is it still flagged 4 hours later? The HN mods can and do turn off user flags on important stories. Edit: why is this being downvoted? You've never seen dang turn off flags? He admits it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15510075 So that raises the question: why not turn off flags on this story?
Re: China accused of forcing 570k people to pick cotton in Xinjiang
#55Re: China accused of forcing 570k people to pick cotton in Xinjiang
#56Vaguely related, in that it involves harvesting cotton in Asia: Turkmenistan uses "forced labour" for the cotton harvest. As I understand it, they need a huge number of people for 2-3 months, so people get drafted in. From the point of view of human rights I suppose it's no worse than a compulsory military service. (Or am I missing something?) Nevertheless, many people would prefer not to buy that cotton or clothes m…
It's Uzbekistan not Turkmenistan, no? Unless they are both at it.
Re: China accused of forcing 570k people to pick cotton in Xinjiang
#57Re: China accused of forcing 570k people to pick cotton in Xinjiang
#58Re: China accused of forcing 570k people to pick cotton in Xinjiang
#59Re: China accused of forcing 570k people to pick cotton in Xinjiang
#60Thats not picked by machines ?
Almost all north XJ cotton is picked mechanically, around 70% of XJ output. Why? Because XJ gdp / labour cost increased so much that labour is increasingly uncompetitive. Hence 4000% increase in orders of John Deere cotton picking machines, followed by US sanctions on John Deere to make sure XJ relies on manual labour so US/Zenz can keep driving the slave labour narrative. The 30% in South XJ is still hand picked, mu…