You're selling yourself as a fast alternative to Jira. There's already an established company doing that ( https://clubhouse.io/ ). They also offer a free plan for teams of up to 10 users. You're obviously in business to make money, so good that you're focused on selling your product, but why would someone pay for Kitemaker rather than use Clubhouse for free? Edit: Yes, Kitemaker has a free plan, but it looks quite l…
Clubhouse use letsencrypt (not professional for a business to do that, seriously), and why do they have a picture that pretends to be a clickable video. Not a good start.
Launch HN: Kitemaker (YC W21) – Fast alternative to Jira, built for remote teams
51–60 of 178 posts
Re: Launch HN: Kitemaker (YC W21) – Fast alternative to Jira, built for remote teams
#52You're selling yourself as a fast alternative to Jira. There's already an established company doing that ( https://clubhouse.io/ ). They also offer a free plan for teams of up to 10 users. You're obviously in business to make money, so good that you're focused on selling your product, but why would someone pay for Kitemaker rather than use Clubhouse for free? Edit: Yes, Kitemaker has a free plan, but it looks quite l…
And now "Unable to log in. We were unable to parse the server response. This could be a networking issue, so please try again later."
Trying Kitemaker now and hoping the HN hug of death isn't approaching. First impressions: I appreciate the keyboard-shortcut-first UI.
Re: Launch HN: Kitemaker (YC W21) – Fast alternative to Jira, built for remote teams
#53You're selling yourself as a fast alternative to Jira. There's already an established company doing that ( https://clubhouse.io/ ). They also offer a free plan for teams of up to 10 users. You're obviously in business to make money, so good that you're focused on selling your product, but why would someone pay for Kitemaker rather than use Clubhouse for free? Edit: Yes, Kitemaker has a free plan, but it looks quite l…
I tried clubhouse.io after seeing your note, and a few minutes into the demo (which was impressive) the site died (which was less impressive). And now "Unable to log in. We were unable to parse the server response. This could be a networking issue, so please try again later." Trying Kitemaker now and hoping the HN hug of death isn't approaching. First impressions: I appreciate the keyboard-shortcut-first UI.
Re: Launch HN: Kitemaker (YC W21) – Fast alternative to Jira, built for remote teams
#54Everybody hates Jira, but it scales to 100,000+ issues across dozens of teams. Even tiny teams (heh, any team that's live and/or has a PM) quickly generate 1000s of issues and JQL is *godlike* in sifting through this stuff. Engineers tell me about Trello and I say, "great place to start" knowing they'll come to the dark side soon enough.
thoughts?
Re: Launch HN: Kitemaker (YC W21) – Fast alternative to Jira, built for remote teams
#55sorry if obvious: if you're going to compare with Jira, then my first question is "but does it scale?" Everybody hates Jira, but it scales to 100,000+ issues across dozens of teams. Even tiny teams (heh, any team that's live and/or has a PM) quickly generate 1000s of issues and JQL is *godlike* in sifting through this stuff. Engineers tell me about Trello and I say, "great place to start" knowing they'll come to the…
We definitely have come close to the scale you're discussing but I look forward to finding out! That said, we have had a number of smaller companies drop Jira for Kitemaker.
Re: Launch HN: Kitemaker (YC W21) – Fast alternative to Jira, built for remote teams
#56You're selling yourself as a fast alternative to Jira. There's already an established company doing that ( https://clubhouse.io/ ). They also offer a free plan for teams of up to 10 users. You're obviously in business to make money, so good that you're focused on selling your product, but why would someone pay for Kitemaker rather than use Clubhouse for free? Edit: Yes, Kitemaker has a free plan, but it looks quite l…
I tried clubhouse.io after seeing your note, and a few minutes into the demo (which was impressive) the site died (which was less impressive). And now "Unable to log in. We were unable to parse the server response. This could be a networking issue, so please try again later." Trying Kitemaker now and hoping the HN hug of death isn't approaching. First impressions: I appreciate the keyboard-shortcut-first UI.
Re: Launch HN: Kitemaker (YC W21) – Fast alternative to Jira, built for remote teams
#57You're selling yourself as a fast alternative to Jira. There's already an established company doing that ( https://clubhouse.io/ ). They also offer a free plan for teams of up to 10 users. You're obviously in business to make money, so good that you're focused on selling your product, but why would someone pay for Kitemaker rather than use Clubhouse for free? Edit: Yes, Kitemaker has a free plan, but it looks quite l…
I thought clubhouse was that audio chat thing, but it seems they don't own an actual domain name for their company.
Re: Launch HN: Kitemaker (YC W21) – Fast alternative to Jira, built for remote teams
#58You're selling yourself as a fast alternative to Jira. There's already an established company doing that ( https://clubhouse.io/ ). They also offer a free plan for teams of up to 10 users. You're obviously in business to make money, so good that you're focused on selling your product, but why would someone pay for Kitemaker rather than use Clubhouse for free? Edit: Yes, Kitemaker has a free plan, but it looks quite l…
Google "alternatives to Jira" and there are hundreds of articles with titles like "33 Best Jira Alternatives". It's a massively crowded market. I thought clubhouse was that audio chat thing, but it seems they don't own an actual domain name for their company.
Re: Launch HN: Kitemaker (YC W21) – Fast alternative to Jira, built for remote teams
#59Re: Launch HN: Kitemaker (YC W21) – Fast alternative to Jira, built for remote teams
#60You're selling yourself as a fast alternative to Jira. There's already an established company doing that ( https://clubhouse.io/ ). They also offer a free plan for teams of up to 10 users. You're obviously in business to make money, so good that you're focused on selling your product, but why would someone pay for Kitemaker rather than use Clubhouse for free? Edit: Yes, Kitemaker has a free plan, but it looks quite l…
Clubhouse use letsencrypt (not professional for a business to do that, seriously), and why do they have a picture that pretends to be a clickable video. Not a good start.