> Is it worth it? > Um. Not really. At current Ethereum prices (2021-02-26), it generates $0.14 of profit per day. It’s still a profit, but very miniscule. The real question is if it makes more money than it costs in electricity. Apple claims it uses 39 W max. That adds up to 0.936 kWh of electricity per day, which we can approximate at 1 kWh. Electricity prices range from ~4¢ to ~20¢ per kWh in the USA, which means…
And you don't take into account the environmental cost.
Mining Ethereum on M1 Mac GPU
51–60 of 129 posts
Re: Mining Ethereum on M1 Mac GPU
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
And you don't take into account the environmental cost.
But precisely as much as you don’t take into account the environmental cost of every other unit of electricity you use.
Re: Mining Ethereum on M1 Mac GPU
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is electricity really that cheap in the USA? The cheapest price I've found for my city here in Germany is like 0,24 EUR. And this is already including a new customer discount and cashback. Not even guaranteed green energy... 0,24 EUR is currently ~0,29 USD. That's 0,29 USD for my cheapest price against your most expensive price with 0,20 USD.
Yes. 1) The US has good hydro resources (in the northwest where it rains all the time and there are lots of mountains so you have both lots of water and altitude change) as well as nuclear (especially in the long-industrialized northeast) that (mostly) has long been paid for and that we just keep running for cheap. Nuclear is about 19% of our electricity, and it's cheap once it has been built for decades. 2) Lots of…
Re: Mining Ethereum on M1 Mac GPU
#54Here's a great post showing that - https://www.vijaypradeep.com/blog/2017-04-28-ethereums-memor... - GPU mining is only 10% slower than the theoretical memory-bound maximum (if compute was infinitely fast).
Re: Mining Ethereum on M1 Mac GPU
#55> Is it worth it? > Um. Not really. At current Ethereum prices (2021-02-26), it generates $0.14 of profit per day. It’s still a profit, but very miniscule. The real question is if it makes more money than it costs in electricity. Apple claims it uses 39 W max. That adds up to 0.936 kWh of electricity per day, which we can approximate at 1 kWh. Electricity prices range from ~4¢ to ~20¢ per kWh in the USA, which means…
Is electricity really that cheap in the USA? The cheapest price I've found for my city here in Germany is like 0,24 EUR. And this is already including a new customer discount and cashback. Not even guaranteed green energy... 0,24 EUR is currently ~0,29 USD. That's 0,29 USD for my cheapest price against your most expensive price with 0,20 USD.
Re: Mining Ethereum on M1 Mac GPU
#56> Is it worth it? > Um. Not really. At current Ethereum prices (2021-02-26), it generates $0.14 of profit per day. It’s still a profit, but very miniscule. The real question is if it makes more money than it costs in electricity. Apple claims it uses 39 W max. That adds up to 0.936 kWh of electricity per day, which we can approximate at 1 kWh. Electricity prices range from ~4¢ to ~20¢ per kWh in the USA, which means…
Re: Mining Ethereum on M1 Mac GPU
#57No-one has mentioned that ETH mining is memory bandwidth bound. M1 macs, unfortunately, have slow GPU memory compared to your discrete GPU's GDDR6X. Here's a great post showing that - https://www.vijaypradeep.com/blog/2017-04-28-ethereums-memor... - GPU mining is only 10% slower than the theoretical memory-bound maximum (if compute was infinitely fast).
Re: Mining Ethereum on M1 Mac GPU
#58How do you know that the mining application is using the M1 GPU and not the M1 CPU?
Re: Mining Ethereum on M1 Mac GPU
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
But precisely as much as you don’t take into account the environmental cost of every other unit of electricity you use.
Ignoring the horrible externalities is effectively the point of all cryptocurrencies by now.
Re: Mining Ethereum on M1 Mac GPU
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is part of why we need a carbon tax
Only problem with this is I can't figure out how to spend all the money generated by the tax. Obviously it should be used at a technology or process to reduce carbon from the atmosphere, but I don't think that's what governments are going to decide to do. Add a new tax, waste most of it. Or worse, use it to fund societally harmful things. That's what the history shows.