Live data from Hacker News

New quantum receiver the first to detect entire radio frequency spectrum

phys.org

51–60 of 79 posts

Re: New quantum receiver the first to detect entire radio frequency spectrum

#51

Maybe it's just me, but this reads to me is as a big load of cleverly worded (misleading) statements that say little, yet make all kind of vague suggestions. I don't know any details about this particular tech, but I think the article says this can detect radio waves over a relatively large spectrum (0Hz..20GHz) simultaneously. It doesn't mention anything about focusing on any particular frequency, or even if it can…

It's not an antenna like I thought at first. It's a tuner with 4 MHz instantaneous bandwidth and a very wide tuning range, https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.14383 - the actual (laser intensity) measurements are done within the RF electrical field above a coplanar waveguide track on a PCB. It's a cool RF tuner. But it still need a real, full size, antenna. It's also not clear to me if they can get the phase informations out…

I think the point is that they are improving the technique. In absolute terms the tuning range and bandwidth aren’t particularly notable compared with current technology. For example Lime Microsystems next generation RFIC under development is targeting a range of 100 GHz and 2 GHz of bandwidth.

https://limemicro.com/technology/

Re: New quantum receiver the first to detect entire radio frequency spectrum

#52

This article got me interested to learn more. There's a related phenomenon called the Rydberg Blockade[1], wherein a group of Rydberg atoms can be tuned to multiple quantum states and because of their large radii, form a coverage area over space in which those quantum states are excluded for other particles (by Pauli exclusion?). There's work to create large arrays, 1D and 2D of tens to hundreds of elements, of Rydbe…

A bigger problem in getting power from fusion is dealing with the resulting neutrons. You can't redirect them out the exhaust, so it's energy you've lost (unless you harness the thermal power of the reactor rather than straight up using it for thrust); they bombard the reactor and can cause regular matter to become radioactive...

Re: New quantum receiver the first to detect entire radio frequency spectrum

#53

This article got me interested to learn more. There's a related phenomenon called the Rydberg Blockade[1], wherein a group of Rydberg atoms can be tuned to multiple quantum states and because of their large radii, form a coverage area over space in which those quantum states are excluded for other particles (by Pauli exclusion?). There's work to create large arrays, 1D and 2D of tens to hundreds of elements, of Rydbe…

A bigger problem in getting power from fusion is dealing with the resulting neutrons. You can't redirect them out the exhaust, so it's energy you've lost (unless you harness the thermal power of the reactor rather than straight up using it for thrust); they bombard the reactor and can cause regular matter to become radioactive...

I think that's true for the easier to ignite reactions like D-T, but there are others that are aneutronic, eg Proton+Boron. It's much harder to initiate, but the fuel is cheap and the energy output higher.

"Aneutronic fusion loses much of its energy as light... Since X-rays can go through far greater material thickness than electrons, many hundreds or thousands of layers are needed to absorb the X-rays." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aneutronic_fusion

Now the Army research in the OP doesn't go up to XRay frequencies, but I haven't found a hard upper limit to the coupling effect yet.

Re: New quantum receiver the first to detect entire radio frequency spectrum

#55
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The article I linked claims: A fractal antenna's response differs markedly from traditional antenna designs, in that it is capable of operating with good-to-excellent performance at many different frequencies simultaneously. Is this inaccurate? The associated electronics are obviously necessary too.

Fractal antennas are mostly snake oil. You’ll always see then driven against a large counterpoise (ground plane), as the counterpoise becomes the radiator. You can make use of Chu’s limit without resorting to fractals. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chu–Harrington_limit

FYI @madengr, almost all of your recent comments - going back a few months, are in [dead] state. Not sure if you've been shadow-banned or what, but you might want to contact the mods or something.

Re: New quantum receiver the first to detect entire radio frequency spectrum

#56
post #18

Another StarTrek tech entering the reality realm. When Voyager stumbled upon a industrial-age civilization Kim immediately notified Janeway that he's detecting "Old style" FM broadcasts. I recall thinking "why would a 24th century subspace-communicator equipped star ship even monitor those?" I got my answer, quantum receivers, they monitor everything.

Why would a 24th century all-purpose info-tool not actively monitor and attempt to characterize all signals received?

I mean look at all the sensors we can pack into a phone nowadays: crazy zooms, infrared, a wide range of radios. And that's in just 10 years, imagine how much improvement can be made in another 400 years. Honestly, if I were regularly beaming down to visit planets at wildly varying and unknown levels of technology I'd want to know as much as my reality-refractor could tell me.

Re: New quantum receiver the first to detect entire radio frequency spectrum

#57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A bigger problem in getting power from fusion is dealing with the resulting neutrons. You can't redirect them out the exhaust, so it's energy you've lost (unless you harness the thermal power of the reactor rather than straight up using it for thrust); they bombard the reactor and can cause regular matter to become radioactive...

I think that's true for the easier to ignite reactions like D-T, but there are others that are aneutronic, eg Proton+Boron. It's much harder to initiate, but the fuel is cheap and the energy output higher. "Aneutronic fusion loses much of its energy as light... Since X-rays can go through far greater material thickness than electrons, many hundreds or thousands of layers are needed to absorb the X-rays." https://en.m…

What if the fusion container was an x-ray laser? Could it induce fusion, where emitted xrays are in phase with the laser? I can imagine that an extreme high energy, directable, phase aligned, giant laser power source could be pretty useful.

Re: New quantum receiver the first to detect entire radio frequency spectrum

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that's true for the easier to ignite reactions like D-T, but there are others that are aneutronic, eg Proton+Boron. It's much harder to initiate, but the fuel is cheap and the energy output higher. "Aneutronic fusion loses much of its energy as light... Since X-rays can go through far greater material thickness than electrons, many hundreds or thousands of layers are needed to absorb the X-rays." https://en.m…

What if the fusion container was an x-ray laser? Could it induce fusion, where emitted xrays are in phase with the laser? I can imagine that an extreme high energy, directable, phase aligned, giant laser power source could be pretty useful.

Yeah, the NIF experiment is laser driven fusion, but I don't think that even being in phase would help capture the light. Not sure. It's the Ryberg coupling with light (without the usual requirement of just lots of mass/shielding) that's kind of unique here

Re: New quantum receiver the first to detect entire radio frequency spectrum

#60
post #18

Another StarTrek tech entering the reality realm. When Voyager stumbled upon a industrial-age civilization Kim immediately notified Janeway that he's detecting "Old style" FM broadcasts. I recall thinking "why would a 24th century subspace-communicator equipped star ship even monitor those?" I got my answer, quantum receivers, they monitor everything.

Why would a 24th century all-purpose info-tool not actively monitor and attempt to characterize all signals received? I mean look at all the sensors we can pack into a phone nowadays: crazy zooms, infrared, a wide range of radios. And that's in just 10 years, imagine how much improvement can be made in another 400 years. Honestly, if I were regularly beaming down to visit planets at wildly varying and unknown levels…

I mean look at all the sensors we can pack into a phone nowadays

Mobile phones used to include a FM receiver but more recent ones have stopped including it because it wasn't deemed useful enough.

Post reply on HN