Vercel raise $40M Series B
51–60 of 208 posts
Re: Vercel raise $40M Series B
#52Many congrats Vercel! I've been a big fan since Zeit platform version 1 - I remember the transition to platform version 2 was difficult but over time I can see how incredible of a platform you've become. Just a note from a fan - I hope you all can determine a way to approach the future with longevity and corporate independence. The web really needs your entire teams dedication towards performance, end user experience…
> avoid being acquired Don't think that's possible after raising such amounts of money. Their way out is now either getting aquired for loads of cash or going public. Going public also means loosing parts or all of your control over the company. Those investors will want to see their money back some time in the future.
not a very intellectually honest statement to make considering founder supervoting shares are extremely common in tech.
Re: Vercel raise $40M Series B
#53Re: Vercel raise $40M Series B
#54Glad to see this because we just started using Vercel for StatusGator. Their API is great: we were able to automate deployments of branded status dashboards very quickly. There are some rough edges around domain name management but overall the experience is very developer-friendly, analogous to Heroku but for a different architecture.
Just to elaborate on that, Vercel is awesome for stateless apps - specially front-end apps. Heroku excels on (small scale) statefull apps - like the back-end app connected to a database (add-on).
In my previous company we used both Vercel and Heroku, which was a great match. Both of them have Review Apps, for example.
Re: Vercel raise $40M Series B
#55No offense, I think people are crazy to rely on a stack they can easily make themselves vs. a series B startup. It's not that difficult to build and deploy full stack apps on your own server.
Re: Vercel raise $40M Series B
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
> avoid being acquired Don't think that's possible after raising such amounts of money. Their way out is now either getting aquired for loads of cash or going public. Going public also means loosing parts or all of your control over the company. Those investors will want to see their money back some time in the future.
> Going public also means loosing parts or all of your control over the company. not a very intellectually honest statement to make considering founder supervoting shares are extremely common in tech.
I don’t actually know, but I was struck by the hyperbole in a comment essentially complaining about hyperbole.
Re: Vercel raise $40M Series B
#57Along the way, showing how OSS businesses can win: Slowly but steadily (looking at you mesosphere).
Congrats to everyone at Vercel! God knows it has taken very many pivots to finally reach here.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12320489
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407503
Re: Vercel raise $40M Series B
#58> Airbnb’s engineering team, for example, isn’t a heavy user of Next.js yet, but they are a world-class team of designers, engineers, product managers, and marketers. This is a semantically null sentence for the purposes of your article. Skip it and you'd have the same meaning without sounding like you're sucking up to a company. > Hashicorp pushed back on the dogmatism of pure static. Their team is laser-focused on…
re: hashicorp - jeff escalante their web team lead gave a talk on their move recently: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlNP3PSLT2Q
Re: Vercel raise $40M Series B
#59“Vercel combines the best developer experience with an obsessive focus on end-user performance. Our platform enables frontend teams to do their best work.”
Nice, inspiring evocative words, but I care to find what the fuck Vercel IS, and this is not an answer.
Maybe if I reword the above it will become clear:
Vercel lets developers have a really great time concentrating super hard looking super close at how fast things are. The thing we do lets you do the best thing you do.
Ah, now it’s crystal clear what Vercel is.
Re: Vercel raise $40M Series B
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
> avoid being acquired Don't think that's possible after raising such amounts of money. Their way out is now either getting aquired for loads of cash or going public. Going public also means loosing parts or all of your control over the company. Those investors will want to see their money back some time in the future.
> Going public also means loosing parts or all of your control over the company. not a very intellectually honest statement to make considering founder supervoting shares are extremely common in tech.