Live data from Hacker News

Anarch: Super small public domain no-dependency from-scratch suckless Doom clone

gitlab.com

51–60 of 64 posts

Re: Anarch: Super small public domain no-dependency from-scratch suckless Doom clone

#51
post #3

This project is not exactly what it promises. The title is "portable suckless [...] 90s-style Doom clone", however, in the technical details, it's specified that "this is my custom engine (raycastlib) based on raycasting, a technique used in Wolf3D engine, but it's improved, e.g. supporting multiple levels of floor and ceiling, so that the visual result is something between Wolf3D and Doom". I don't think a that an i…

That seems a bit pedantic and a kinda negative, the whole thing read to me like a parody on the whole 'it's not a real machine unless someone's made doom run on it meme' and a homage to doom style games. It didn't seem to me like it was taking a jab at modern games or anything too serious. Just someone having a bit of fun, bragging a bit and showing off their work. Nothing to get so worked up about. It's a neat proje…

Point taken! (although it seems the author is very serious in their anti-capitalistic stance)

Re: Anarch: Super small public domain no-dependency from-scratch suckless Doom clone

#52

That's an admirable project I wish I could live long enough to see sentient robots become part of society and protest this violent game which discriminates robots and encourage violence towards machines. #AIUnitedCancelAnarch I also wish this wouldn't so political, I don't see what capitalism has done to this guy - including giving him the tools to create this game! There are also plenty of games that can be played a…

> I also wish this wouldn't so political,

Every project is political. If it doesn't question the status quo, it is condoning it tacitly. That is in itself a political action. This fetish with not being "political" is generally a dogwhistle for (extreme) right-wing thoughts, which may or may not be something you want to espouse.

Re: Anarch: Super small public domain no-dependency from-scratch suckless Doom clone

#53

I admire the adherence to principle and depth of execution, however I find something about this incoherent. Shaving off some aesthetic components of violence and positioning the work as anticapitalist does not address the core issue of every game project: What does the game facilitate a study of? That's not a leading question or "gotcha". It's just the thing every game player will ask at some point: What is it about?…

This was a really unexpected critique to read here, I really enjoyed reading it.

Re: Anarch: Super small public domain no-dependency from-scratch suckless Doom clone

#54
post #12

From the “manifesto”: > In today's world of capitalism and fascism Today’s world is run by neoliberal planned economies, what some Communists might call “state-run capitalism” (usually in reference to China). Fascism and capitalism is so far away from an accurate description of how today’s world operates. When you’re that far on the left, you lose the ability to distinguish between Fascism and Liberalism.

Consider instead that you may be so far too the right you've stopped being able to distinguish fascism from centrism.

Re: Anarch: Super small public domain no-dependency from-scratch suckless Doom clone

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That seems a bit pedantic and a kinda negative, the whole thing read to me like a parody on the whole 'it's not a real machine unless someone's made doom run on it meme' and a homage to doom style games. It didn't seem to me like it was taking a jab at modern games or anything too serious. Just someone having a bit of fun, bragging a bit and showing off their work. Nothing to get so worked up about. It's a neat proje…

Point taken! (although it seems the author is very serious in their anti-capitalistic stance)

No worries on their politics though. What I see is an pretty cool project with some potential.

Ports to oddball or custom devices are lean projects. This is fun too. I hope some happen and maybe some other games get made.

Re: Anarch: Super small public domain no-dependency from-scratch suckless Doom clone

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think it is satire, but if the author reads this, one first reading it really seems like they want to get people to hate them, but I don't think they do. ALso, they really shouldn't claim "Doom clone" when their game is, technically, much worse than doom in many ways, when one of their major arguments is other games are "made wrong".

> on first reading it really seems like they want to get people to hate them Didn’t read it like that at all. I just read someone explaining their principles and how it relates to something they make.

That was my take too. They are super committed and motivated. Not a thing wrong about that.

What I like is their "you do you" approach. The license makes things clear. The author expressed themselves, what they are about in a way that also empowers others to do the same thing, everyone with basically no worries.

That frankly, is a healthy political expression.

Re: Anarch: Super small public domain no-dependency from-scratch suckless Doom clone

#57

That's an admirable project I wish I could live long enough to see sentient robots become part of society and protest this violent game which discriminates robots and encourage violence towards machines. #AIUnitedCancelAnarch I also wish this wouldn't so political, I don't see what capitalism has done to this guy - including giving him the tools to create this game! There are also plenty of games that can be played a…

I actually don't mind violence even against people as long as it's only in games, movies etc. Never in real life. All people should be able to strictly tell apart games and reality, and then violence in games can actually be helpful to relieve the inherent need for violence in humans without hurting anyone. I used robots just to bring attention to pacifism and because I found it a nice replacement for demons, plus it…

> I don't mind if anyone forks this and takes all politics out. Or even put your own politics in.

Solid move. In your expression, others are empowered to also express themselves.

Re: Anarch: Super small public domain no-dependency from-scratch suckless Doom clone

#58

Play it online here: https://drummyfish.gitlab.io/anarch/bin/web/anarch.html To the creator thank you for making this. I also enjoyed reading the manifesto. Keep up the good work and never stop fighting capitalism.

You don't really have to fight capitalism. You can find some homestead land and gather up people for a commune.

For now. That's getting harder to do.

Eventually, everything will be monetized. It's getting more difficult to find public spaces where there isn't an expectation of spending money now. Noticeable.

And maybe it's not a fight. Better management is a plausible path. More people more happy, maybe with the cost of some people not being peak happy.

Re: Anarch: Super small public domain no-dependency from-scratch suckless Doom clone

#59
post #49
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not nonsense at all, and nothing you wrote contradicts what I said. You can blame any human activity on "human nature". At one time human nature gave us the slave trade, but we still made slavery illegal. Calling it "human nature" doesn't mean there's nothing we can do about it. When I say "structurally enforces", I mean that it amplifies the natural urge to have more, or do better, than someone else. For exampl…

> Bit it's a bit much when you end up with someone who has 10,000,000x the comfortable persons wealth. That's not human nature: that's a structure set up to funnel the wealth that ordinary people have created, to a tiny number of individuals. And I see that as a problem even if you don't. That is not enforced by capitalism, though. Capitalism isn't a single incarnation of an economic system, it's an entire landscape…

> This however, didn't stop party officials...[gaining massive wealth]...

Well, exactly. And you don't think they earned that wealth, I presume? You think they took it from the ordinary working person. So why are you arguing that this exact same behaviour is acceptable under a Capitalist system?

Your other points are worth addressing and you argue well, but there are too many for one post. I don't like the funneling of wealth that happens with Copyright either, so I'd like to see it abolished, if that answers some of your later stuff.

Re: Anarch: Super small public domain no-dependency from-scratch suckless Doom clone

#60
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't really have to fight capitalism. You can find some homestead land and gather up people for a commune.

For now. That's getting harder to do. Eventually, everything will be monetized. It's getting more difficult to find public spaces where there isn't an expectation of spending money now. Noticeable. And maybe it's not a fight. Better management is a plausible path. More people more happy, maybe with the cost of some people not being peak happy.

I don't understand what you are saying, especially with a sentence that just says "Noticeable."

You do realize that an hour outside of almost any city in the US is practically uninhabited right? Land as a whole is not in short supply.

Post reply on HN