Live data from Hacker News

Gitlab Blocked Iranians’ Access

ahmadhaghighi.com

51–60 of 353 posts

Re: Gitlab Blocked Iranians’ Access

#51
What steps can maintainers of projects hosted on GitHub/GitLab/etc take to make their projects available to users in countries affected by this US policy?

For example, is there an alternative git hosting site where it would be helpful for me to maintain a fork, so that the README is available and people can open issues and PRs?

Similarly, where would be a good place to host the binaries built on each release so that they are accessible?

Re: Gitlab Blocked Iranians’ Access

#52
Yeah, blame U.S. corporations complying with their law, while your country has not had a single step for resolution of the sanctions.

Also if an Iranian developer is unprepared against losing their access to Gitlab, then sadly they are incompetent developers.

Re: Gitlab Blocked Iranians’ Access

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's your alternative to sanctions that's more effective? War?

no sanctions may[0] be equally effective as sanctions. [0] https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201803_e.pdf The literature isn't conclusive either way, there's evidence in both directions. But sanctions definitely tend to hurt everyday citizens more than they hurt the targeted governments. Dictators and cronies aren't going to have to worry about increased prices of goods - they get whatever they want - tha…

The point of doing this is to make the citizenry unhappy with the government causing the mess for them. The ideal case is that they force change so that the sanctions go away. But depending on local propaganda, that may or may not work.

Re: Gitlab Blocked Iranians’ Access

#55
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's your alternative to sanctions that's more effective? War?

The only thing Iran is guilty of is insufficient deference to US hegemony. Any other charge you levy can have its equal found in our so-called allies in the region, or even the US itself.

Well, I think the sanctions exists because of the nuclear program.

NATO is not going to trade and help technologically a country that's trying to develop nuclear weapons in order to threaten to NATO and their main officially stated enemy – United States.

Why would you buy oil from a country or give access to your tech to them when they are using these resources to ramp up their military against you?

Re: Gitlab Blocked Iranians’ Access

#56

> GitLab is not the only actor in this discrimination against Persian/Iranian people, we also blocked by GitHub, Docker, NPM, Google Developer, Android, AWS, Go, Kubernetes and etc. US sanctions compliance most likely Edit: confirmed by Gitlab: https://twitter.com/gitlab/status/1312183287402512384

Characterizing this as “discrimination against Persian people” is extremely dishonest. There are like half a million Persian people in America alone, as many as there are Wyomingites, who have the same access to GitLab as anyone else; this is a question of commerce between the U.S. and Iran, not a question of discrimination against Persians.

Re: Gitlab Blocked Iranians’ Access

#57
post #3

GitLab can’t do nothing about it, and whining will not help. Everything is on government level.

Of course GitLab can do something about it. It happened, as their tweet says, because they changed vendor. So it sounds like they may be able to work around it by changing their hosting choices.

Also, this may come as a shock to you, but when a law is sufficiently unjust, there can come a time to disobey the law. In this case, disobeying the law would not directly risk anyone's safety, lowering the barrier somewhat.

Re: Gitlab Blocked Iranians’ Access

#58
post #35

Yes, gitlab has no choice but to block them. Also yes, gitlab doesn't really care about them or they would have given some sort of notice. Even 24 hours.

Does the law have an exemption for notifying people and giving them a grace period? As this is sanctions / export control, I was under the impression that deficiencies in compliance had to be corrected as soon as they were noticed - which in this case would mean cutting off business relations and communications immediately.

Re: Gitlab Blocked Iranians’ Access

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or host your own GitLab instance in Iran.

GitLab (the company) are legally not permitted to export their product: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/people-group/code-of-condu... According to them, that includes downloads. So no luck there either.

It's not like it's impossible to VPN into the US, download the software from there and then self-host it in Iran.

Re: Gitlab Blocked Iranians’ Access

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let people live their lives?

So, Russia under sanctions, for annexation of Crimea, should just be left alone to leave their lives? Next time, if they decide to annex some other part of Ukraine, or maybe Poland this time, they should also be left to live their lives? Sanctions are not punishments. They are just a way to say – you're an asshole, and neither us nor our allies are going to play with you anymore.

I mean, taking steps to deter a country from annexing or triggering a war makes sense.

But the sanctions against Iran are mainly based on old grudges. Pretty much nobody even knows why they exist beyond “they’re bad.”

Post reply on HN