Live data from Hacker News

Mayflower 400: the science of sailing across the ocean in 1620

theconversation.com

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: Mayflower 400: the science of sailing across the ocean in 1620

#51
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would the group of literate people contain enough people also concerned with accurate record keeping? They seem to be relatively distinct and not necessarily overlapping skills or interests. And plenty of record get lost no matter how well they're kept. Fires, floods, disinterest, etc. But for some people such a lineage is like a vanity address. And they will go out of their way to dig up a connection like this and a…

> They seem to be relatively distinct and not necessarily overlapping skills or interests. Actually, literacy is a prerequisite for record keeping.

I think what they meant was that having an interest in literacy doesn't mean someone is also interested in record keeping.

Re: Mayflower 400: the science of sailing across the ocean in 1620

#52
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My grandmother traced her family back to the 30 years war. No records after that. Churches are a very good source for that in Europe. That being said, I never understood the obsession with lineage.

why not? What's the harm in knowing.

No harm, it's more that after a certain amount of generations the information becomes pretty irrelevant. You arbitrarily choose to follow certain lines (for prestige or historical significance) and necessarily disregard others. Going back to the 1600s, you descend in equal part from one lineage you mention and many thousand others which remain entirely unknown.
Post reply on HN