Live data from Hacker News

Intel Launches 11th Gen Core Tiger Lake

anandtech.com

51–60 of 214 posts

Re: Intel Launches 11th Gen Core Tiger Lake

#51
post #15

The contrast in community enthusiasm between this and Nvidia's 3xxx announcement could not be more severe.

Well, nVidia is selling a new GPU that's faster than 2080 Ti for $500, then 3090 that's faster and $1000 cheaper than Titan RTX.

Intel announced 10th Gen CPU lineup with a new logo.

Re: Intel Launches 11th Gen Core Tiger Lake

#52
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

and in 2007

Actually, Crysis Remastered is due for release soon. So the meme lives on.

I wonder what would happen if Crytek released a version of the game that took "make it minimally require next year's hardware" to the extreme, and whether the meme would cause everyone to just either quietly buy new hardware, or declare a Vista-esque revolt.

Re: Intel Launches 11th Gen Core Tiger Lake

#53
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That was exciting. The performance gains are exciting. The product is exciting. The architecture is exciting. This is not exciting, unless I’m entirely missing the exciting part of this, which is wholly possible.

Native Thunderbolt, much faster clock speeds, and greatly improved graphics. Solid offering all around I think. Should give some competition for the Ryzen 4000-series laptop chips.

> Native Thunderbolt

A nice tweak sure but also irrelevant as a consumer. It just results in one less component on the motherboard, it doesn't change any functionality.

> much faster clock speeds

Relative to what? Last year's 4c/8t 14nm i7-10510U has a higher boost frequency than any of the chips announced today, and it's also a 15 W TDP CPU. The 4c/8t i7-1185G7's 3ghz base frequency is nice I guess but barely higher than last year's 4c/8t i7-8569U at 2.8ghz base - and both are 28W TDP. Probably, anyway - the 11th gen is listed in the '12-28 W' category but as it's the highest base freq of the listed quad cores I assume it sets the top end of that range.

If there's a power improvement here, which is possible, it's not clear in the spec sheet, and I think nobody is buying Intel's marketing claims at this point. So we won't have reasons to be excited here until reviews hit, if a reason to be excited for this exists at all.

> greatly improved graphics

This is an great upgrade, but only for Intel. It's playing catch up to the Ryzen 4000-series, which means it's not exciting on its own for consumers. Exciting in that competition drives price wars & overall stronger ecosystem, but on its own? Super boring.

Re: Intel Launches 11th Gen Core Tiger Lake

#54
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That was exciting. The performance gains are exciting. The product is exciting. The architecture is exciting. This is not exciting, unless I’m entirely missing the exciting part of this, which is wholly possible.

Native Thunderbolt, much faster clock speeds, and greatly improved graphics. Solid offering all around I think. Should give some competition for the Ryzen 4000-series laptop chips.

improving Intel graphics is not much of a feat

Re: Intel Launches 11th Gen Core Tiger Lake

#57
Weird to see this "partial" announcement - since it's mostly for the U-series chips (up to 28W TDP). This suggests that Intel must really be getting pressure to release something competitive against AMD's Renoir offerings. The more performance-orient chips (traditionally known as "H series" but who know the new branding...) is still unannounced and unknown.

Will have for 3rd party benchmarks to determine the real performance improvements. The single-core and GPU are certainly the highlights, but it's odd that even the top-end i7 chips still retain the 4 physical cores. AMD's 4700U is already at 8 physical cores.

Re: Intel Launches 11th Gen Core Tiger Lake

#59

From a quick read, in case anyone is wondering, this is built on the latest-gen 10nm process which is a refinement on the previous 10nm process. Intel's goal was to focus on clock increases, so the instruction per clock is apparently not much changed. From looking at the tables, the whole line of processors appear to have nicely improved one core max clock speeds, which should hopefully help single core performance,…

I did a similar shift. I would say the new one is quite a bit faster.
Post reply on HN