Live data from Hacker News

Twitter bans 7k QAnon accounts, limits 150k others as part of broad crackdown

news.yahoo.com

51–60 of 281 posts

Re: Twitter bans 7k QAnon accounts, limits 150k others as part of broad crackdown

#51

I’d like to see Antifa added to this growing list as well. The article states this group has “ties to dangerous real-world activities”. Does anyone know of any? Or is this just conjecture? The article’s statement was fairly vague.

Yeah let's start by banning the US military accounts, the og antifa

Re: Twitter bans 7k QAnon accounts, limits 150k others as part of broad crackdown

#52
post #44

I’d like to see Antifa added to this growing list as well. The article states this group has “ties to dangerous real-world activities”. Does anyone know of any? Or is this just conjecture? The article’s statement was fairly vague.

Can you describe to me what you think Antifa is?

A group of communists? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifaschistische_Aktion

Re: Twitter bans 7k QAnon accounts, limits 150k others as part of broad crackdown

#53
post #43
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds Orwellian

Good thing many alternatives exist!

What if Google and Twitter deside that those "alternatives" are hateful for disagreeing politically and stop linking them on their platforms making it extremely difficult/impossible to find them?

Re: Twitter bans 7k QAnon accounts, limits 150k others as part of broad crackdown

#54
post #6

Article says that the Wayfair ordeal was a Qanon conspiracy. How was that attributed to them?

By following the digital trail - https://www.insider.com/wayfair-human-trafficking-conspiracy...

Deleted

Re: Twitter bans 7k QAnon accounts, limits 150k others as part of broad crackdown

#56
post #14

It's been encouraging to see companies grow a backbone and crack down on harassment and hate campaigns, and not hide behind cowardly cries of "free speech." Twitter has taken too much time to do this, but recently they've been doing it more. Even Reddit, notorious for powering and consciously allowing hate campaigns, has cracked down more. It's also been interesting that the proponents of allowing these campaigns to…

What has Qanon ever said that can be remotely considered hateful? Who determines what is hateful?

QAnon is not a person; it's a moral panic.

It's a massive group of people LARPing about the most serious crimes anyone can be accused of and it focuses on new people nearly every day. No trials. Weak evidence. No way for the accused to face their accuser. It's as bad as the worst of "cancel culture".

Re: Twitter bans 7k QAnon accounts, limits 150k others as part of broad crackdown

#57

The average person isn’t capable enough to judge information for themselves; we need people in power to curate what is seen.

Yes they are, they've done it for all of modern civilization. People in power telling us what to think doesn't end well. The issue is social media and the speed and scale of information without identity or verification. That's not going to be solved by curation.

"A lie can get halfway around the world before the truth can even get its boots on", that old adage.

But social has supercharged the whole affair, as you say, in speed and scale. Curation cannot solve it, but can it have some role in moderating it? What other tools do we have to throttle the damage? Do we need to axe social media entirely?

Re: Twitter bans 7k QAnon accounts, limits 150k others as part of broad crackdown

#58
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you be more specific?

He retweeted a video wherein a man yelled white power.

White Power! Oh...did that hurt someone’s feelings? Hmm..

All Power!! Crap...someone else has hurt feelings..

Just show respect to others, set an example, and turn the other cheek when needed. Hate generates hate which generates hate.

When you begin bringing up Trump in a topic completely unrelated...I feel sorry for you. So many people have so much hate in their lives, it’s really sorrowful.

Re: Twitter bans 7k QAnon accounts, limits 150k others as part of broad crackdown

#59

The average person isn’t capable enough to judge information for themselves; we need people in power to curate what is seen.

Yes they are, they've done it for all of modern civilization. People in power telling us what to think doesn't end well. The issue is social media and the speed and scale of information without identity or verification. That's not going to be solved by curation.

Do you propose Twitter does no curation then?

Is it a question of where do we draw the line, or whether there should be a line?

Re: Twitter bans 7k QAnon accounts, limits 150k others as part of broad crackdown

#60

It's been encouraging to see companies grow a backbone and crack down on harassment and hate campaigns, and not hide behind cowardly cries of "free speech." Twitter has taken too much time to do this, but recently they've been doing it more. Even Reddit, notorious for powering and consciously allowing hate campaigns, has cracked down more. It's also been interesting that the proponents of allowing these campaigns to…

> It's been encouraging to see companies grow a backbone and crack down on harassment and hate campaigns

Grow a backbone, or fold to public pressure?

Post reply on HN