If the police can plant malware on a device, then they can also plant evidence on a device. What percentage of these people are being framed? 10%? 50%? No way of knowing.
How Police Secretly Took over a Global Phone Network for Organized Crime
51–60 of 61 posts
Re: How Police Secretly Took over a Global Phone Network for Organized Crime
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Police has legal rights (given they do it by protocol and with judicial oversight) for most kinds of interception and monitoring, whether they do it by force or by asking does not matter - in most or all of EU.
Not so - you need evidence backed suspicion of a serious crime in the eu jurisdictions I know of. And even then it needs to be narrowly targeted to individuals.
In my mind the key is that it’s the French that did it ...
Re: How Police Secretly Took over a Global Phone Network for Organized Crime
#53So did I miss anything here, or is this a story of how law enforcement took over an entire fleet of devices, put a rootkit on all of them, and the only reason we know about it is that the company seems to have had a solid reason (wouldn't call it backbone in this specific case) to publish the whole thing? It reads to me like, had Encrophone not opted to inform all their customers, this would have simply gone on? I ha…
Re: How Police Secretly Took over a Global Phone Network for Organized Crime
#54Got a 2-year heads up https://hn.algolia.com/?q=encrochat
Re: How Police Secretly Took over a Global Phone Network for Organized Crime
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's explained in this French PDF : http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/press/Documents/2020-07-02_Enc...
Can a French speaker please give us a tldr?
post scripton
Re: How Police Secretly Took over a Global Phone Network for Organized Crime
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's explained in this French PDF : http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/press/Documents/2020-07-02_Enc...
Can a French speaker please give us a tldr?
I’m extremely surprised by the latter, it seems that one has to declare any operational use of cryptography when it’s not for those two uses.
Re: How Police Secretly Took over a Global Phone Network for Organized Crime
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can a French speaker please give us a tldr?
A judge was heading the investigation and provided the legal go-ahead for the actions. The legal justification is twofold: evidence of organized crime uncovered in a preliminary investigation and (!) lack of declaration of cryptographic solution deployment , which is apparently a thing [0] when it’a not used for authentication or data integrity control! I’m extremely surprised by the latter, it seems that one has to…
Re: How Police Secretly Took over a Global Phone Network for Organized Crime
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can a French speaker please give us a tldr?
in 2017, French Gendarmerie ( a part of the french public order system, that work outside the big city - Police is working in the big city. It's a join branch of army and interior ministry. It has a good reputation with computer, like using linux) detected phones in criminal affairs. In 2019, a project called Cerberus was create with 60 gendarmes full time working on the case. They investigated servers located in fra…
Re: How Police Secretly Took over a Global Phone Network for Organized Crime
#59If the police can plant malware on a device, then they can also plant evidence on a device. What percentage of these people are being framed? 10%? 50%? No way of knowing.
Re: How Police Secretly Took over a Global Phone Network for Organized Crime
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your making a big assumption that criminal==stupid. Every single criminal has the exact human capacity of everyone else, the difference is in education. Check your privilege.
Point of order to mods on this, is "check your privilege," within the realm of civil discourse? It seems unnecessarily provocative. However, if it is fair game, my response would be "check your reading comprehension," as the further implication of my comment is that societies are locking up their most entrepreneurial and productive members for creating too much value. Using the privilege dog whistle is just cheap int…
My comment stands. And further, drugs don't sell themselves, a lot of good hard work and smarts goes into it. It's unfortunately the only easy avenue for those without an education and steady home life.