Live data from Hacker News

Apple Faceshield

support.apple.com

51–60 of 663 posts

Re: Apple Faceshield

#51

Available for just $199 in 7 countries, rollout to 19 more countries on April, 25

They made 20,000,000 of them already and they’re free. I assume you’re joking but they’re trying to save lives and I don’t see the need for negativity around this.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/04/apple-will-battle-co...

Re: Apple Faceshield

#52
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is such an insane problem. I've been trying to source N95s and everyone I've talked to, even very reliable people, keep bringing me counterfeits without realizing it. I'm actually really concerned their physicians are using those N95 masks. Thankfully face shields are less of a risk.

Some commentators, disproportionately Silicon Valley VC types, are absolutely befuddled at why the FDA needs to exist and why regulations are slowing things down. It's like they can't imagine a crisis worse than COVID being created by a sloppy and irresponsible response (exempting, of course, responses that hurt their investment portfolios, all of which are bad).

Oh wow. I think it's easy to "fix" it: give them a pill (of actually sugar) but present it as a cure that you developed in your basement to whatever ailment they have. Skin in the game works wonders on such cheap bullshitters.

Also please post links, always good to know whom to avoid.

Re: Apple Faceshield

#53

Good on them for helping fight the problem, but there's definitely a dystopian sci-fi trope of a familiar brand creating products that only exist because the world is in a disaster. Sort of like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4lS9poHvpU

Of the superficial. By the superficial. For superficial. Unconscious of their mantra Apple is. And that ignorance is bliss.

Re: Apple Faceshield

#54
post #5

I’m sad that even though this unique design was done and put online for anyone to print by Prusa, he is hardly mentioned now. On top of that, the design is already commercialized. EDIT: I see now that the design is different, you’re right

How do you mean? This Apple design looks very different from any that I can find attributed to "Prusa" (not sure if that's a person or a company, but the company put out 3D print designs that are very different). And all of them, of course, copy shields that were out long before the current crisis. A lot of people were prototyping shields to satisfy a sudden and overwhelming demand, and with 3D printers it seemed lik…

Prusa is both a person (joseph prusa) and the company he made (Prusa3d) that designs and manufactures 3d printers.

You're right though that they're not the same, beyond what similarity the function brings.

Re: Apple Faceshield

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was hoping everyone in the US might be able to buy one. Ideally, they'd be cheap enough for municipalities to buy and distribute.

Why? Most ordinary non-healthcare-worker people have no need for this level of PPE, especially if they're following social distances rules like they should be.

I can't control what other people do in grocery stores. They walk too close and there's nothing I can do about it. I'd like something to keep shit out of my eyes.

Re: Apple Faceshield

#56
post #47
post #15

Where they describe how to sterilize it: DO NOT mix those chemicals together (e.g., bleach + rubbing alcohol = chloroform).

And while we're here, let's go ahead and get these others out for people to read: Bleach+vinegar = chlorine gas, Bleach+ammonia = chloramine, Bleach+rubbing alcohol = chloroform Just don't mix bleach with anything. And while we're at it, don't mix hydrogen peroxide and vinegar, either.

You need to add an extra newline at the end of each equation so it doesn't run all on one line. Like this:

Bleach+vinegar = chlorine gas

Bleach+ammonia = chloramine

Bleach+rubbing alcohol = chloroform

Re: Apple Faceshield

#57
post #44

Can someone explain to me why is Apple making this type of stuff?

1) Because they _can_. They have the manufacturing connections to quickly connect the needed pieces

2) Because they have the spare cash to spin this up very quickly.

3) Because they want to help (or at a minimum, look like they're helping).

Are there any reasons why they _shouldn't_ be making this kind of stuff? Other companies also meet all 3 of those conditions, and I think we should be glad (note: I'm saying 'glad' and not 'grateful') that any of them are doing this.

Re: Apple Faceshield

#59
post #15

Where they describe how to sterilize it: DO NOT mix those chemicals together (e.g., bleach + rubbing alcohol = chloroform).

Yeah, they should drop bleach from that list. It degrades the shield and it might just do more harm than good.

Re: Apple Faceshield

#60
post #44

Can someone explain to me why is Apple making this type of stuff?

Because Apple has the supply chain and manufacturing connections to produce this stuff quickly, efficiently, and safely, and then utilize their distribution partners to get these things in the hands of medical professionals quickly.

EDIT: Octoth0rpe posted at the same exact time, lol.

Post reply on HN