I've been in the habit for years of making liberal use of the catch-all feature of email to make up email addresses unique to everything. This makes it easy to add NDR bounces to specific email addresses that end up on f-ing mailing lists I don't want or for which the address was sold/given to other groups (political parties are the WORST about this!).
Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
51–60 of 72 posts
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
For the geographically-challenged: present-day Austria is land-locked, and thus has no call for a navy, let alone a naval academy.
Why would that prevent them from having a small navy? Assuming some country is happy for them to pay to have a port somewhere. Although they don't it wouldn't surprise me much to learn that they did have one despite being land-locked.
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#53Double opt in required should be a law. When my email is given by mistake by similarly named people but I can't correct the mistake because only customers can contact them. Oh the iritating irony of getting security tips from the coop bank when I'm not the account holder.
I've had this problem with a Netflix subscription in a foreign language. I kept getting mail for it, but couldn't read what it was about, and couldn't easily opt out. The only option was to reset password, login, change the language, and then cancel the subscription. At least I was fortunate I could easily cancel the subscription. You can't do that with bank accounts.
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are so many stories like this. My favorite (although this one is very good) is that that a bunch of academics got together and pasted together some absolute nonsense (I assume this is from the era before SciGen) and submitted it to a conference. When it was accepted they revealed the hoax, and the conference admins claimed that it was because these academics were obviously very good, they figured the paper was…
For the geographically-challenged: present-day Austria is land-locked, and thus has no call for a navy, let alone a naval academy.
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would love to see the reviewer report.
The article that modernerd linked to has links at the bottom, in the "Appendix". The reviewer report is here: https://scholarlyoa.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/review-form....
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are so many stories like this. My favorite (although this one is very good) is that that a bunch of academics got together and pasted together some absolute nonsense (I assume this is from the era before SciGen) and submitted it to a conference. When it was accepted they revealed the hoax, and the conference admins claimed that it was because these academics were obviously very good, they figured the paper was…
For the geographically-challenged: present-day Austria is land-locked, and thus has no call for a navy, let alone a naval academy.
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#57This reminds me of Doug Zongker's "Chicken Chicken Chicken: Chicken Chicken" [0]. Sadly, Google Scholar appears to no longer be showing its citation count, although, IIRC, it used to be well in the hundreds. [0]: https://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL_-1d9OSdk
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
While a good deal of our entertainment circa 1993 (Computer Science Honours, Sydney University) centered around exploiting this delightful fact (close second: unattended terminals), I had long since figured that forging emails off a open SMTP port wasn't really still A Thing.
Use your own domain for email and watch the 'hacker' spam roll in.
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#59This reminds me of Doug Zongker's "Chicken Chicken Chicken: Chicken Chicken" [0]. Sadly, Google Scholar appears to no longer be showing its citation count, although, IIRC, it used to be well in the hundreds. [0]: https://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf
The only improvement that could be made to that masterpeice is to include an actual image of a chicken...
ASCII art, made up of repetitions of the word 'chicken'.
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just ask them honest questions that are insulting to their ability to recruit
Can you elaborate?