The criticism -- almost all the other comments at this point -- focuses on one aspect of the low-code app: It has to be re-written once it grows. * While this is true, I don't think Bethan or any other low code advocate would dispute that. The question is: can you get test an idea with low code. The answer to that might be a trivial yes, but if you had asked me what that means, I would guess a team of 3 people could…
> That is the real insight here. To me, the insight is that the less you care about the future of your "product", the less time you have to put into it. I look at the linked site, and all I see is "Minimal". I don't see any viability, I don't see a product (identifying what's being sold takes a few clicks). I also see a bevy of GDPR violations. I see an ADA (or the EU equivalent) liability. I, as a security conscious…
He probably should think about all these things, for sure. And maybe have taken more than 4 hours :) , they're not necessary risks for sure, and since you've pointed them out, now he can fix them :)