Live data from Hacker News

How much a baby is touched leaves measurable effects on DNA methylation (2017)

miamiherald.com

51–60 of 94 posts

Re: How much a baby is touched leaves measurable effects on DNA methylation (2017)

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not a professional scientist, but shouldn't the spirit of science be curiosity and exploration at all times, not shooting down a new idea as soon as you hear it? If such an attitude were present in every person, science would not progress at all. I'm not that long a veteran here, but I think at HN we are more interested in having our minds and ears open and feeling we can comfortably share and discuss articles th…

I think that science works best if we marry two mindsets: the joy of seeing something novel, and the suspicion of seeing something too good to be true. They don’t have to be present in equal measure for every article, and while I wouldn’t word it the same way as the parent, I appreciate the healthy skepticism on this topic.

Yes: a good reasoner is charitable and critical. You need both.

Re: How much a baby is touched leaves measurable effects on DNA methylation (2017)

#52
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But that would be an edge case. I would have assumed that identical twins behave similarly. How do they find enough neglected twins to make a reliable conclusion.

I’ve known three sets of identical twins. In each case the personalities were very different. Outgoing vs reserved, aggressive vs laid back, etc. I could easily see one wanting to be held more than the other.

Anecdotal, but... My (fraternal) twins have very distinct and different personalities. One requires an order of magnitude more attention than the other. We try to make up the difference, but it's hard.

Re: How much a baby is touched leaves measurable effects on DNA methylation (2017)

#53
post #3

I think there is a high chance that is 100% bullshit. Most likely has to do with confusing cause-and-effect. It could be just as well that highly methylated babies cry more and could be more demanding or parents with highly methylated babies are themselves less tolerant to crying thus end up handling babies more. The problem, they way it is being reported, and they way it lines up with pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo g…

To add to that, there are so many problems with self-reported studies.

> They also asked parents to keep track of how long and how often they gave care to their child that involved physical contact, according to a press release.

Re: How much a baby is touched leaves measurable effects on DNA methylation (2017)

#55
post #36
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure I follow the causality argument here. A twin study should normalize everything genetically. Ergo epigenetic expression and environment are the only two causal levers. It sounds like you're arguing that parental involvement has a causal impact, which is the point of the studies to a degree. Perhaps my original question was unclear: is there something the twins do or have done to them that cause a latent s…

We are questioning how much the parenting has an affect on the child. The parents are self-selected and so are more likely to be similar to each other.

Agreed. That was my point. Not all twins under adoption are adopted, meaning there is nothing particularly invalidating about the twin study framework.

Re: How much a baby is touched leaves measurable effects on DNA methylation (2017)

#58
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> is at its infancy at best. Hence why the main source is published with ~90 subjects studied. Science starts with one paper/experiment and builds from there. > The lie is not that A and B are present at the same time. The lie is presenting story as if A was caused by B. There is absolutely no evidence for that. That's not a lie. It's called a hypothesis. It's testable. They've tested it and encourage others to test…

I will tell you what they did. They collected data, with no hypothesis or any idea what they are looking for, then desperately fit various models until something showed up as statistically significant. Of course, you could say: how dare you, how would you even know, ... I work in this field, the p-hacking, harking (hypothesizing after the results are known) is both pervasive and endemic. they massaged the factors, th…

Your comments on this?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2682215/

Re: How much a baby is touched leaves measurable effects on DNA methylation (2017)

#59
post #47
post #2

Hmm... I have three children - and all are intelligent, beautiful well adjusted kids. 5, 7, and 15. One thing I made a point of as each was born - I maintained as much physica contact with each immediately after birth. I didnt allow them to leave or be examined without me there, touching them. I did it not for the posted reasons, but just beacuse it felt right to me. ALso - I would hum and sing to them a tune while t…

Here's another magical experience. No one will believe it, but it's true, so here goes. We too would read, sing and hum to my son in-womb. While doing so, we'd occasionally hear a loud click, the source of which we couldn't determine. But after he was born, we found out. He would press his tongue hard against the roof of his mouth then release it with a suction "pop". Was he trying to communicate back to us from the…

I don't think this would work without air.
Post reply on HN