51–60 of 209 posts
Next step is to provide automated fixes. I've have a side project that does it for Go source code: https://fixmie.com (have plans for other languages and protocols). But due my Visa situation here in the US (H1B), I'll be never able to monetize it as it's illegal to have a side income. But I think this is just the start and there is an huge opportunity for new startups and projects.
Please do us a favor and consolidate all these Amazon announcements into a single announcement page link. This is ridiculous.
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
Next step is to provide automated fixes. I've have a side project that does it for Go source code: https://fixmie.com (have plans for other languages and protocols). But due my Visa situation here in the US (H1B), I'll be never able to monetize it as it's illegal to have a side income. But I think this is just the start and there is an huge opportunity for new startups and projects.
Wouldn't that create worse programmers?
If you squint this looks like a baby step towards computers writing code.
Next step is to provide automated fixes. I've have a side project that does it for Go source code: https://fixmie.com (have plans for other languages and protocols). But due my Visa situation here in the US (H1B), I'll be never able to monetize it as it's illegal to have a side income. But I think this is just the start and there is an huge opportunity for new startups and projects.
DISCLAIMER: I am not an attorney. More importantly, I am not your attorney. The above is not legal advice. If you desire legal advice, consult a competent, licensed attorney in your area.
Next step is to provide automated fixes. I've have a side project that does it for Go source code: https://fixmie.com (have plans for other languages and protocols). But due my Visa situation here in the US (H1B), I'll be never able to monetize it as it's illegal to have a side income. But I think this is just the start and there is an huge opportunity for new startups and projects.
The code review feature seems too expensive to run on every PR automatically (to me): $0.75 per 100 lines of code. From their example pricing: "if you have a typical pull request with 500 lines of code, it would only cost $3.75 to run CodeGuru Reviewer on it." I wonder if it's actually good enough to justify that price.
“Time to hire some code golfers, we’ll put the whole app into one line of code.”
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've never seen a linter tell me problems with code in this detail before: > You are using a `ConcurrentHashMap`, but your usage of `get()` and `put()` may not be thread-safe at lines: 110, 113, 135, and 137 . Two threads can perform this same check at the same time and one thread can overwrite the value written by the other thread.
staticccheck for Go does _some_ of this kind of thing (documenting improper usage). https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks