Firefox Full-device VPN
51–60 of 122 posts
Re: Firefox Full-device VPN
#52Re: Firefox Full-device VPN
#53Re: Firefox Full-device VPN
#54So what is the benefit of getting this through Firefox instead of Mullvad? They want my email to sign up for the waitlist, but Mullvad requires nothing. Seems like it may even be linked to your Firefox account.
However, this partnership would most likely benefit both Firefox and Mullvad. Firefox gets a stream of revenue (independent of Google) that would be used to finance development, and Mullvad acquires additional customers through the partnership who would otherwise not know about it.
Re: Firefox Full-device VPN
#55So, the regular price is $5.00/month, but with that incredible partnership, it's only $4.99! This is a game changer!
Mullvad actually charges €5/month, which is about $5.54. (This doesn't take into account the 10% discount if you pay with Bitcoin or Bitcoin Cash.) The $4.99 rate would be a 55 cent discount over the standard rate, which matches the cryptocurrency discount and would likely help support Firefox financially. Mozilla has been trying to diversify its revenue for a long time: https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/02/13/reven…
Re: Firefox Full-device VPN
#56just fyi opera has had a free built-in vpn for some time. works a peach.
Re: Firefox Full-device VPN
#57I'm way below the technical skill average on HN, so can I prevale upon someone to correct me? This is just a vpn right? My existing vpn is already putting all device traffic through its servers (though it would actually be nice to turn it off for some apps, as I can't order takeaway because everyone thinks I'm in Iceland). And its $5 a month, which is about what I already pay. Plus its not available except on windows…
Re: Firefox Full-device VPN
#58Re: Firefox Full-device VPN
#59I thought WireGuard was not yet ready for primetime, why is it being used here? I've been wanting to stand up a VPN at work to make my life easier than SSH tunneling but I was waiting for a 1.0 release of WG.
Re: Firefox Full-device VPN
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Again, I'm happy to be corrected, but I thought that affected 1 server out of 1000s? Errors will inevitably happen with any system on that scale. Will Mozilla be more forthcoming or secure? Maybe but surely 1 error per 1000 servers is a manageable known risk vs Mozilla "may be perfect or terrible"?
NordVPN was mainly criticized for how they handled the disclosure. They didn't admit to the server breach until a whistleblower revealed it publicly a year later. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-21/after-twi... The utility of a VPN is mainly based on trust, and NordVPN's lack of transparency in that incident is a breach of trust.