I read this, and become more concerned about bills to give the US President an Internet kill-switch. They say it's to protect against cyber-warfare, but something makes me think it's just as likely to be applied to civil unrest, and civil unrest doesn't usually happen unless there's something pretty wrong with the government.
People in the US government are becoming painfully aware though just how dependent every bit of our infrastructure is becoming on continued internet function. Nobody is really sure, for example, just how much of the phone and power networks would stay up if all IP routing is shut down.
So more than likely, any new laws passed are going to have the effect of giving the president the fine-tuned ability to tamper with specific websites, addresses, protocols, etc. even if that's not the how the bill is sold to the public.