Live data from Hacker News

Google’s Play Store gives a worse age rating to Fleksy, a Gboard rival

techcrunch.com

51–60 of 114 posts

Re: Google’s Play Store gives a worse age rating to Fleksy, a Gboard rival

#51

This is a tangent, but is there a good keyboard app for Android that doesn't have emoji? I'm tired of hitting the emoji button accidentally and having emoji show up in autocomplete.

I was just thinking I should look into making one if there isn't one, seems like there would be market for a good, simple keyboard app.

Re: Google’s Play Store gives a worse age rating to Fleksy, a Gboard rival

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm guessing it is more that the different teams do not talk to each other, and Google must not have a good, standard review process. "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

Never attribute stupidity to that which is adequately explained by self-interest. It's extremely convenient that Google had an oopsie that's entirely aligned with their own interests.

I mean, this could be as simple as internal app teams not going through the same form, or not getting re-reviewed automatically because it's assumed they'll speak up if they add anything objectionable. And Fleksy's point about being targeted for their increasing use count wouldn't require intentional targeting either - that could just be an automatic "trigger an extra review when user count grows enough".

Which doesn't make it acceptable, obviously. It just means that malice isn't required for unfairness - all it takes is Google fixing the dumb mistakes which hurt them faster than the ones that hurt others.

Re: Google’s Play Store gives a worse age rating to Fleksy, a Gboard rival

#53
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, it would be one thing if Google stated that as a reason. I really hate this in-app purchase model, and now being applied to something as stupid as a keyboard, something that can literally monitor all your data and send back your most common words to advertisers ... ugh. I pre-ordered a Purism 5 from the next batch in anger a few weeks ago. I want off this Android/eyeProduct bullshit. I want full control of my…

How would your ideal open-source smartphone ecosystem be structured? Genuinely interested as I'm looking to explore this as a potential project myself with my team.

Can't we just mirror a regular Linux distro model ? Or possibly a Enterprise Linux model where you pay a subscription and obtain bug fixes, stability gurantees & support.

Re: Google’s Play Store gives a worse age rating to Fleksy, a Gboard rival

#54
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How would your ideal open-source smartphone ecosystem be structured? Genuinely interested as I'm looking to explore this as a potential project myself with my team.

Flat subscription of $10 a month for the app store. Once a month, your phone tells the store what percentage of time you spend in apps from that store. Firefox has 40% of your time? They get $4.

[deleted]

Re: Google’s Play Store gives a worse age rating to Fleksy, a Gboard rival

#55

On a related note, does anyone have recommendations for a Gboard alternative? I've disabled all the "pipe everything I type directly to HQ for analysis" things in Gboard but I'd prefer a non-Google alternative.

AnySoftKeyboard is completely open-source and is distributed through both the Play Store and F-Droid. It comes with many different layouts and there are a few language packs available. They recently added experimental support for swipe typing if that's a concern.

Re: Google’s Play Store gives a worse age rating to Fleksy, a Gboard rival

#56
post #39

This rating is based on a questionnaire: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answ...

Someone didn't read the article:

> Fleksy’s team have done so over the years — and come up with the PEGI 3 rating without issue. But this month they found they were being issued the questionnaire multiple times and then that their latest app update was blocked without explanation — meaning they had to reach out to Play Developer Support to ask what was going wrong.

> After some email back and forth with support staff they were told that the app contained age inappropriate emoji content. Here’s what Google wrote:

> > During review, we found that the content rating is not accurate for your app… Content ratings are used to inform consumers, especially parents, of potentially objectionable content that exists within an app.

> > For example, we found that your app contains content (e.g. emoji) that is not appropriate for all ages. Please refer to the attached screenshot.

Google is apparently upset that the app contains a middle finger emoji. Which GBoard also contains. GBoard is rated 3+, not 12+/16+.

Post reply on HN