Live data from Hacker News

Bobby Bonilla's 25-Year Contract with The New York Mets (2011)

businessinsider.com

51–57 of 57 posts

Re: Bobby Bonilla's 25-Year Contract with The New York Mets (2011)

#51
post #5

Einstein something, something, compound interest. Amazing what saving money at an 8% interest rate will do for your future self! The S&P has only returned 4.8% CAGR [1] from 2000-2018 so that was a pretty tremendous ROI for Bonilla. [1] - http://www.moneychimp.com/features/market_cagr.htm

Interest rate in India has been largely in the 8-9% in the last 15 years. I hear it was in the double digits in the early 90s.

Real or nominal?

Re: Bobby Bonilla's 25-Year Contract with The New York Mets (2011)

#52

If I were an athlete I'd push for a contract like this, being young with a ton of money can be a recipe for disaster.

If you knew to set up a contract like this, would you really need to avoid having lots of money while young?

Re: Bobby Bonilla's 25-Year Contract with The New York Mets (2011)

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see how it was even a particularly bad contract, let alone the "worst in sports history". Borrowing money at 8% is a pretty reasonable commercial lending rate for the time (30-year fixed mortgages were only a couple points lower). So, they took out a $5.9MM loan from Bonilla to pay Bonilla, accrued interest for 11 years without making any payments, and then started paying it off on a 25 year amortization sche…

It was bad for Bobby Bonilla.

I mean, he turned $5.9M into $30M, then made $1.1M in the time he would have made $5.9M. Doesn't seem like that bad a deal for him.

Re: Bobby Bonilla's 25-Year Contract with The New York Mets (2011)

#56

The article doesn't mention that team owner Fred Wilpon thought deferring Bonilla's contract was a great idea because he could use the savings at the time to invest in Bernie Madoff's fund. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/21/sports/baseball/mets-saw-...

It really seems like a poor choice to dramatically alter the financing of another business because some other unrelated investment is doing well.

That seems like just doubling down in a bad way.

Post reply on HN