Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 68.0

mozilla.org

51–60 of 282 posts

Re: Firefox 68.0

#51
post #8
post #2

"Dark mode in reader view expands so that windows are also dark on the controls, sidebars and toolbars." Thank god.

the blank white page is killer. inbetween page loads a bright flash of white.

I use Shadowfox [1] and it corrects this issue. Adds a dark theme to many other components on Firefox too.

[1] - https://overdodactyl.github.io/ShadowFox/

Re: Firefox 68.0

#52
post #4

I love Firefox. First thing I install on any new computer. Super happy they keep pushing the web forward. Not a fan of the chromium quasi monopoly (not that the folks behind it are bad, just that any monoculture is problematic). Thanks for pushing the web forward!

The whole chromium project gives out the 'death star' vibe for me. I'm sure the engineers who are working on it are good people but the end result seem lead to destruction of open web as we know it by the Gempire.

[deleted]

Re: Firefox 68.0

#53
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Will it also eventually roll out for those with Intel Integrated Graphics?

Eventually… https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1479781 You can enable/disable webrender in about:config if you want to try it out (gfx.webrender.all). I've switched to it on my laptop (HD Graphics 620, Gentoo Linux). So far so good.

On my case that just results in a black page for every site.

Re: Firefox 68.0

#54
post #20

"Cryptomining and fingerprinting protections are added to strict content blocking settings in Privacy & Security preferences." my first reaction is it's really sad to see this. looks like something Google blackmailed them into adding. maybe Im missing some aspect to this.. but why is mining crypto bad but showing ads is not? I rather mine coins/ether/whatever for the website owners than see more ads moving away from…

It's off by default for security. If you want it on, it takes 4 clicks to enable it. Menu -> Options -> Privacy & Security -> Cryptominers.

Edit: alternatively, you can enable this per-site by clicking the shield icon that appears next to the URL when something has been blocked.

Re: Firefox 68.0

#55

This marks the last Android release with extensions/add-on support. There will not be a 69 release of this edition of Firefox for Android ("Fennec"). The new remake of the mobile browser ("Fenix") does not have extensions support and it is on an indefinite and easily ignorable backlog. It is explicitly not being worked on this quarter. At the end of this quarter is the scheduled release of Firefox 69. Unless there's…

Wait what? Extensions are the biggest reason I'm using Firefox on my mobile and the only way I got people to switch to it. How can they just be removing them for any period of time?

Re: Firefox 68.0

#56

> Local files can no longer access other files in the same directory. What impact will this have on web development without a web server? It sounds like you won't be able to load CSS or JS.

Most web languages include a simple web server you can start with one command from any directory.

php -S localhost:8080

Re: Firefox 68.0

#57
post #24
post #20

"Cryptomining and fingerprinting protections are added to strict content blocking settings in Privacy & Security preferences." my first reaction is it's really sad to see this. looks like something Google blackmailed them into adding. maybe Im missing some aspect to this.. but why is mining crypto bad but showing ads is not? I rather mine coins/ether/whatever for the website owners than see more ads moving away from…

Crypto-mining scripts are mostly silent; if your computer doesn’t have a loud fan to spin up, you’re hardly able to even tell one is running other than on its eventual impact on battery life. As such, they’re a favoured tool of script-kiddies who deface websites. They take over a site, and then drop a crypto-miner onto the site to make themselves money, otherwise leaving everything intact. Sometimes even the site own…

If they wanted to show me which websites are impacting my battery life that'd be fantastic! That's a great idea

There seems to be a conflict of interest when a browser singles out one of the biggest threats to the online ad industry while being funded by that same industry

(~90% of Mozilla's money is from Google according to Wikipedia)

While we're on the topic, does anyone have a good guide for adding a crypto miner to a simple static website? (like Githubpages)

Re: Firefox 68.0

#58
I can't use `--ProfileManager` or launch a new instance with a named profile (`-P 'ProfileName'`).

Instead of opening a new window with the requested profile, it opens a new window of the same profile that's already running.

Launching from about:profiles works.

Is anyone else running into this?

Re: Firefox 68.0

#59

This marks the last Android release with extensions/add-on support. There will not be a 69 release of this edition of Firefox for Android ("Fennec"). The new remake of the mobile browser ("Fenix") does not have extensions support and it is on an indefinite and easily ignorable backlog. It is explicitly not being worked on this quarter. At the end of this quarter is the scheduled release of Firefox 69. Unless there's…

Wait what? Extensions are the biggest reason I'm using Firefox on my mobile and the only way I got people to switch to it. How can they just be removing them for any period of time?

Yeah, no kidding. Seems pretty significant, like pretty much a non-negotiable reason to switch to another browser if there is one with extension support.

Re: Firefox 68.0

#60
post #2

"Dark mode in reader view expands so that windows are also dark on the controls, sidebars and toolbars." Thank god.

Similarly, I wish the app itself enabled Dark Mode on Mojave. File save/etc dialogs are awfully white in a darker environment.

(More broadly, I wish Apple would allow things like file dialogs to force to dark mode. I know you can set NSRequiresAquaSystemAppearance to NO, but it tends to mess up a bunch of other random stuff too)

Post reply on HN