YouTube bans content “showing users how to bypass secure computer systems”
51–60 of 701 posts
Re: YouTube bans content “showing users how to bypass secure computer systems”
#52I dont understand this, if it can be bypassed, by definition, it is not secure?
Re: YouTube bans content “showing users how to bypass secure computer systems”
#53Rhetorical question: If a YouTube video can show how to bypass it, does it really count as a "secure" system?
Re: YouTube bans content “showing users how to bypass secure computer systems”
#54There are thousands of hours of excellent cybersecurity content hosted on YouTube. The possibility of losing this wealth of information and history is shocking to me. Time to start the archive effort. And to finally appreciate what so many other communities have gone through when they've found themselves on the wrong side of one of the internet behemoths. I feel naive.
Do you have any recommendations on channels to archive?
There are a ton more, these are just ones I've been watching in the past 6 months or so.
Re: YouTube bans content “showing users how to bypass secure computer systems”
#55This is as good a time as any to start archiving your favorite channels, you can point youtube-dl at a video URL, a playlist, or a username. brew install youtube-dl youtube-dl https://www.youtube.com/user/DEFCONConference/ Showing 2460 videos, I'll have to grab a few harddrives.
Re: YouTube bans content “showing users how to bypass secure computer systems”
#56Does this mean that all the reverse engineering videos, con talks, prof of exploit demos, CTF walkthroughs', and fuzzing tutorials will be removed? What about videos showing me how to use tools like Twistlock? Will they be exempt, but videos about burp be banned? What constitutes a "secure" computer system? Side note, I guess its time to fire up youtube-dl. Are there any channels that need to be archived? I normally…
DEFCON, CCC, and other infosec groups need to move to peertube ASAP.
Re: YouTube bans content “showing users how to bypass secure computer systems”
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rhetorical answer: If you can secure a system through legislation, it is no longer necessary to secure it through engineering.
That's certainly the (false) belief under which many legislative and governmental bodies operate.
Re: YouTube bans content “showing users how to bypass secure computer systems”
#58My guess is that a tech player with a big ad spend is unhappy about YouTube tutorials teaching users to de-DRM their content or jailbreak their consumer devices.
Re: YouTube bans content “showing users how to bypass secure computer systems”
#59There are thousands of hours of excellent cybersecurity content hosted on YouTube. The possibility of losing this wealth of information and history is shocking to me. Time to start the archive effort. And to finally appreciate what so many other communities have gone through when they've found themselves on the wrong side of one of the internet behemoths. I feel naive.
Do you have any recommendations on channels to archive?
'IppSec' has around 100 CTF walkthroughs.
'Open SecurityTraining' has ~200 tutorial vids on topics like reverse engineering and malware analysis.
Edit: added a few more.
Re: YouTube bans content “showing users how to bypass secure computer systems”
#60Youtube updating its policy to ban videos they have already monetized from, while the creators get nothing. Youtube is a monopoly. Creators need to get off YT, and onto something else if it exists.
YouTube was born in an era of a half dozen different non-standard codecs. Now H.264/MP4 works on everything from TVs to watches.
The reality is that most content on YouTube isn’t even worth the bandwidth it costs to get it to people. Most creators are just looking for a handout for creating mindless nonsense.