Live data from Hacker News

AMD Responds to WSJ ‘Keys to the Kingdom’ Story

amd.com

51–60 of 61 posts

Re: AMD Responds to WSJ ‘Keys to the Kingdom’ Story

#51
My understanding of the structure of the arrangement when I first heard about it was that it was designed to not transfer IP, but to allow China to make their own chip, in a manner of speaking, without actually having the important IP. Even ignoring national obligations, it would just be bad business to hand that over.

"AMD put significant protections in place to protect its intellectual property (IP) and prevent valuable IP from being misused or reverse engineered to develop future generations of processors."

That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if they got the IP anyway, just that wasn't the intention. AMD CEO Lisa Su made some comments a few weeks ago that the joint venture was already dead in the water and was just for one project only. I get the feeling AMD wasn't too happy about the way it all turned out.

Re: AMD Responds to WSJ ‘Keys to the Kingdom’ Story

#52

Hypothetical question: Let's say a news source writes a story that tanks a company's stock price and then, over the course of time the company is able to prove the story is false and/or the news source is unable to back up the story. Can the company sue the newspaper for damages?

You can generally sue for anything you feel like.

However if the press demonstrates that they followed reasonable journalistic practices and weren’t blatantly lying, they’d be fine.

Re: AMD Responds to WSJ ‘Keys to the Kingdom’ Story

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, like Bloomberg's The Big Hack ?

First thing that came to mind. As far as I know they're still claiming it was accurate.

They can claim whatever they want. But they have no proof, and there has been plenty of counter evidence.

Re: AMD Responds to WSJ ‘Keys to the Kingdom’ Story

#54
Intel did (probably forced by recent at the time $1B Qualcomm penalty in China) the very same thing with Atom IP, twice!

https://www.anandtech.com/show/8061/this-is-huge-intel-enter...

http://linuxgizmos.com/intel-invests-1-5-billion-in-chinese-...

Not only Intel gave away its CPU IP, it also "invested" $1.5B in Tsinghua Unigroup. Whats more last year they shared 5G modem IP with Unisoc, part of Tsinghua Unigroup holding.

Re: AMD Responds to WSJ ‘Keys to the Kingdom’ Story

#55

Hypothetical question: Let's say a news source writes a story that tanks a company's stock price and then, over the course of time the company is able to prove the story is false and/or the news source is unable to back up the story. Can the company sue the newspaper for damages?

I'm not being my answer on any laws, but am replying with the eye of an investor.

A story or rumour affecting the short term price of a company stock, might leave little recourse to the company, as that price can return back to what it was relatively quickly. There would have been some reputation damage, but I wouldn't weigh stock price to be a good measure of that.

If the company was maybe in the middle of raising funds, say bonds from the market, or using additional shares; they would have stronger case if the false story hindered such find raising.

A company is often not affected by short-term fluctuations in its external "value".

If in the other hand, there's an investor who was adversely affected by such news, the stock price directly affects them. Perhaps they would have a stronger case.

This is my opinion based on my intuition.

Re: AMD Responds to WSJ ‘Keys to the Kingdom’ Story

#56
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My guess is that he shorted SuperMicro during that time period- that makes the most sense to me.

Or the opposite, as in buying the stock when it was down and seeing it nearly double since then.

Why not both? As a party with inside knowledge you can profit in both directions easily.

Re: AMD Responds to WSJ ‘Keys to the Kingdom’ Story

#58
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

First thing that came to mind. As far as I know they're still claiming it was accurate.

And it certainly hasn’t been proven false

I mean they’re the ones making the claim, the onus probandi lies with them.

Re: AMD Responds to WSJ ‘Keys to the Kingdom’ Story

#59
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Made good money off that one :D

Interesting, can you provide more detail?

Nothing super fancy

After their stock crashed there was a small window of time where the tech crowd had concluded the claim is bullshit but the stock didn't go back up.

Checked out their financials and that seemed fine so stuck money in it and waited for it to recover

Re: AMD Responds to WSJ ‘Keys to the Kingdom’ Story

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting, can you provide more detail?

My guess is that he shorted SuperMicro during that time period- that makes the most sense to me.

No bought after the crash. And no, no insider info. Just willingness to take a bit of risk
Post reply on HN