Live data from Hacker News

What's the point of stealing $1.5 million in casino chips from the Bellagio?

slate.com

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: What's the point of stealing $1.5 million in casino chips from the Bellagio?

#51
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think they're overstating how many casinos use RFID. The last time I looked into it, only the Wynn did - and then only to track denomination, not as a unique identifier. (Perhaps someone can correct me if things have changed) The goal is to help security detect cheating by tracking bets at the table games electronically, not prevent counterfeiting or theft.

Most RFID tags have a unique identifier in them. You can duplicate said identifiers, but if they are indeed globally unique and can not be reprogrammed then the thief is still out all that money and the chips are worthless.

I doubt they use global unique identifiers. RFID takes longer to read longer numbers, especially if there are many targets in the same field.

So 32bit global ID for all chips would take a long time to read, possibly minutes if it's a table with 1000 chips on it. A 4bit code that just ID'ed value and allowed you to spot if somebody had 'mistakenly' mixed up some low value chips in a stack would be much quicker.

Re: What's the point of stealing $1.5 million in casino chips from the Bellagio?

#52

The article doesn't answer the question posed in the title. What is the point?

The point is deftly avoided by focusing on the high-denomination chips that nobody with a brain would try to fence and ignoring how many lower-denomination ones the thief got away with.

Casinos don't like to admit that they've been stolen from - they like to appear impenetrable. So here, they've successfully fed the AP a line that the theft that happened really doesn't matter, and the AP will spread their marketing for them in every outlet that reprints their stories.

Post reply on HN