Earlier quoted context omitted.
The importance society places on something can be judged by how much money it's willing to spend on it. The NSF budget for astronomy is $250M/year. Revenue projections for Starlink reach as high as $50B/year.
Astronomy isn't limited to the US and the NSF is not the only funding agency in the US. Sure, the annual cost isn't $50B/year, but that's a shitty metric to use, it is textbook tragedy of the commons.
It doesn't capture the value of individuals looking up and seeing stars. But I suspect the continued migration to highly illuminated cities shows that value isn't very high either.